Australian Open · QF · Hard · 27 Jan 1998
Venus Williams v Lindsay Davenport
89–84 in points · Lindsay Davenport won
Why it went the way it did
Venus Williams won 2.2 more points than Lindsay Davenport relative to what the serve alone predicted. Lindsay Davenport's biggest leaks: backhand execution −1.8, forehand execution −1.8, serve 1st execution −0.9.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Venus Williams | Lindsay Davenport | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | −0.2 | −1.4 | −1.6 | +0.4 | −0.2 | −0.9 | −0.7 |
| Serve 2nd | −0.1 | −0.2 | +1.1 | +0.8 | −0.1 | −0.1 | +0.2 | ±0.0 |
| Return | +0.3 | +0.4 | +1.5 | +2.2 | +0.5 | ±0.0 | +1.6 | +2.1 |
| Forehand | −0.3 | +1.1 | −1.4 | −0.5 | +0.6 | +0.8 | −1.8 | −0.4 |
| Backhand | −0.3 | +0.8 | +1.3 | +1.8 | +0.8 | +1.0 | −1.8 | ±0.0 |
| Slice | −0.2 | −0.7 | −0.1 | −1.0 | +0.1 | −0.6 | −0.6 | −1.1 |
| Net | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.5 | +1.5 | +0.2 | +0.2 | +0.6 | +1.0 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.4 | +0.3 | −0.1 |
| All shots | −0.6 | +1.2 | +2.5 | +3.1 | +2.6 | +0.8 | −2.4 | +1.0 |
Set by set
| Set | Venus Williams | Lindsay Davenport | Net, Venus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +3.7 | −3.4 | +7.2 | |
| 2 | +1.1 | +2.0 | −0.9 | |
| 3 | −1.7 | +2.4 | −4.1 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Venus Williams serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47% 78% | 11% 100% | 42% 88% |
| 2 | 40% 50% | 14% 20% | 46% 50% |
| 3 | 23% 38% | 29% 50% | 49% 41% |
Set to set −0.43 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.60 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Lindsay Davenport serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46% 33% | 15% 50% | 38% 40% |
| 2 | 43% 63% | 11% 60% | 45% 35% |
| 3 | 50% 54% | 8% 100% | 42% 45% |
Set to set −0.81 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −1.06 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Venus Williams
8.4 points left on the table across 299 shots 2.80 per 100 shots
- Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×10; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.48 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×10; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.43 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley down the line ×3; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.41 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.33 pts
Lindsay Davenport
6.2 points left on the table across 298 shots 2.10 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley down the line ×2; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×3; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Return +1: drive to your middle hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.23 pts