Vienna · F · Hard · 14 Oct 2001
Tommy Haas v Guillermo Canas
96–83 in points · Tommy Haas won
Why it went the way it did
Tommy Haas won 3.4 more points than Guillermo Canas relative to what the serve alone predicted. Guillermo Canas's biggest leaks: backhand execution −2.8, slice shot selection −2.3, serve 1st execution −1.1.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Tommy Haas | Guillermo Canas | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −1.1 | −1.2 | −0.2 | −0.2 | −1.1 | −1.5 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | −0.1 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −0.1 | +1.1 | +0.9 |
| Return | +0.3 | −0.9 | +1.6 | +1.0 | ±0.0 | +0.3 | +0.4 | +0.6 |
| Forehand | +0.1 | +1.1 | −0.9 | +0.3 | +0.3 | +1.8 | ±0.0 | +2.0 |
| Backhand | −0.3 | +0.4 | +2.5 | +2.6 | −0.2 | −0.1 | −2.8 | −3.1 |
| Slice | +0.6 | −4.3 | +0.4 | −3.3 | −0.5 | −2.3 | −0.4 | −3.2 |
| Net | +0.3 | ±0.0 | +1.3 | +1.5 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.5 | +1.5 |
| Touch | −0.1 | −0.5 | −0.3 | −0.9 | ±0.0 | −0.5 | −0.2 | −0.6 |
| All shots | +0.9 | −4.4 | +3.6 | ±0.0 | −0.7 | −1.1 | −1.6 | −3.4 |
Set by set
| Set | Tommy Haas | Guillermo Canas | Net, Tommy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1.8 | −1.6 | +3.4 | |
| 2 | −0.5 | −0.7 | +0.2 | |
| 3 | −1.2 | −1.1 | −0.1 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Tommy Haas serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38% 89% | 8% 0% | 54% 69% |
| 2 | 33% 100% | 8% 100% | 58% 71% |
| 3 | 47% 61% | 13% 60% | 39% 47% |
Set to set +1.40 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.59 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Guillermo Canas serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43% 50% | 9% 100% | 48% 55% |
| 2 | 41% 86% | 12% 100% | 47% 63% |
| 3 | 44% 57% | 25% 50% | 31% 20% |
Set to set +2.20 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.16 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Tommy Haas
7.0 points left on the table across 284 shots 2.48 per 100 shots
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court hit BH slice through the middle ×6; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.45 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: slice to your middle, opponent at net hit BH through the middle ×1; BH down the line rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×3; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: volley to your middle, opponent at net hit BH through the middle ×1; BH down the line rates higher · 0.25 pts
Guillermo Canas
6.8 points left on the table across 294 shots 2.33 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.36 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.26 pts