RallyIQ

Roland Garros · R32 · Clay · 2 Jun 2006

Dmitry Tursunov v David Nalbandian

137–139 in points · David Nalbandian won

Why it went the way it did

David Nalbandian won 3.0 more points than Dmitry Tursunov relative to what the serve alone predicted. Dmitry Tursunov's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −2.5, net execution −1.6, touch shot selection −1.1.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotDmitry TursunovDavid Nalbandian
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.3 −0.3 +2.5 +2.6 ±0.0 −0.3 +2.3 +2.0
Serve 2nd ±0.0 −0.1 +0.6 +0.5 ±0.0 −0.1 +1.4 +1.4
Return +0.4 +0.3 +1.5 +2.1 +0.3 −0.5 +3.4 +3.1
Forehand +0.5 +1.5 +2.5 +4.5 ±0.0 +3.1 +3.3 +6.4
Backhand −0.4 −0.5 +3.2 +2.4 +0.5 −0.8 +3.9 +3.6
Slice ±0.0 −2.5 +0.4 −2.1 ±0.0 −5.6 −0.7 −6.4
Net +0.4 +1.1 −1.6 −0.1 +0.3 +0.9 +1.0 +2.2
Touch −0.1 −1.1 +1.3 +0.1 +0.1 −0.2 +0.8 +0.7
All shots +1.2−1.6 +10.3+10.0 +1.0−3.6 +15.5+12.9

Set by set

SetDmitry TursunovDavid NalbandianNet, Dmitry
1+4.2−1.0 +5.2
2−0.1−1.5 +1.4
3+3.6+3.4 +0.3
4+2.5+7.9 −5.4
5−0.2+4.2 −4.4

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Dmitry Tursunov serving

SetWideBodyT
1 50% 75% – 50% 100%
2 50% 80% – 50% 87%
3 42% 55% 8% 100% 50% 62%
4 42% 73% – 58% 40%
5 55% 50% 3% 100% 41% 42%

Set to set +0.51 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.01 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

David Nalbandian serving

SetWideBodyT
1 50% 0% – 50% 33%
2 48% 69% 22% 83% 30% 75%
3 42% 63% 5% 100% 53% 55%
4 39% 78% 13% 67% 48% 73%
5 55% 76% 6% 100% 39% 42%

Set to set −0.63 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.37 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Dmitry Tursunov

9.9 points left on the table across 461 shots 2.14 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×7; FH inside-in rates higher · 1.14 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×17; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.66 pts
  3. Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×11; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.43 pts
  4. Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×9; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.38 pts

David Nalbandian

11.9 points left on the table across 454 shots 2.62 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH crosscourt ×5; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.98 pts
  2. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×5; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.82 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.34 pts
  4. Return of a 2nd serve, wide, deuce court hit FH crosscourt ×6; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.32 pts