Hobart · QF · Hard · 15 Jan 2015
Zarina Diyas v Alison Riske Amritraj
34–61 in points · Alison Riske Amritraj won
Why it went the way it did
Alison Riske Amritraj won 14.3 more points than Zarina Diyas relative to what the serve alone predicted. Zarina Diyas's biggest leaks: forehand execution −4.6, slice execution −0.9, touch shot selection −0.6.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Zarina Diyas | Alison Riske Amritraj | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | −0.4 | ±0.0 | −0.2 | −0.6 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.2 | +0.2 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −0.1 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.7 | +0.6 |
| Return | −0.4 | +0.5 | +0.1 | +0.3 | +0.1 | +0.1 | +2.1 | +2.3 |
| Forehand | −0.1 | +1.0 | −4.6 | −3.7 | −0.1 | +1.8 | +5.7 | +7.4 |
| Backhand | +0.2 | +0.3 | −0.4 | +0.2 | −0.4 | +0.3 | +0.5 | +0.4 |
| Slice | −0.2 | −0.6 | −0.9 | −1.7 | −0.1 | −0.9 | −1.6 | −2.6 |
| Net | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.5 | +0.6 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | −0.6 | +0.9 | +0.2 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 |
| All shots | −0.9 | +0.6 | −5.1 | −5.4 | −0.5 | +1.4 | +8.0 | +9.0 |
Set by set
| Set | Zarina Diyas | Alison Riske Amritraj | Net, Zarina | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1.7 | +5.7 | −7.3 | |
| 2 | −3.7 | +3.3 | −7.0 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Zarina Diyas serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31% 18% | 46% 38% | 23% 63% |
| 2 | 32% 33% | 11% 0% | 58% 36% |
Set to set +3.07 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.36 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Alison Riske Amritraj serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50% 73% | 27% 50% | 23% 40% |
| 2 | 47% 78% | 16% 100% | 37% 43% |
Within sets −2.12 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Zarina Diyas
4.8 points left on the table across 182 shots 2.64 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×9; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.49 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.35 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.20 pts
Alison Riske Amritraj
5.1 points left on the table across 176 shots 2.88 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
- Return +1: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, wide, deuce court hit FH crosscourt ×4; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.23 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts