RallyIQ

Newport · SF · Grass · 20 Jul 2019

Marcel Granollers v Alexander Bublik

96–89 in points · Alexander Bublik won

Why it went the way it did

Marcel Granollers won 5.5 more points than Alexander Bublik relative to what the serve alone predicted. Alexander Bublik's biggest leaks: serve 2nd execution −5.2, return execution −3.2, serve 1st execution −2.9.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotMarcel GranollersAlexander Bublik
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st −0.2 +2.3 −4.7 −2.6 −0.4 −0.2 −2.9 −3.6
Serve 2nd +0.1 +0.2 −2.0 −1.6 ±0.0 +0.4 −5.2 −4.8
Return +0.2 +0.8 −2.7 −1.7 −0.3 −0.5 −3.2 −4.0
Forehand −0.2 +0.5 +0.3 +0.6 ±0.0 +1.8 +0.8 +2.6
Backhand ±0.0 ±0.0 +0.4 +0.4 ±0.0 ±0.0 +0.9 +0.9
Slice +0.1 −0.9 +0.3 −0.4 ±0.0 −0.8 −1.0 −1.8
Net +0.2 +0.6 −0.1 +0.7 ±0.0 −0.1 +1.6 +1.5
Touch −0.1 −0.8 +1.0 +0.1 ±0.0 +0.2 −1.0 −0.8
Other ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.5 +0.3 −0.1
All shots +0.1+2.7 −7.4−4.6 −0.6+0.3 −9.8−10.1

Set by set

SetMarcel GranollersAlexander BublikNet, Marcel
1−4.6−3.9 −0.7
2+1.8−5.7 +7.5
3−1.8−0.5 −1.3

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Marcel Granollers serving

SetWideBodyT
1 41% 65% 20% 75% 39% 50%
2 37% 86% 16% 67% 47% 89%
3 52% 54% 20% 80% 28% 71%

Set to set −0.85 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.44 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Alexander Bublik serving

SetWideBodyT
1 35% 46% 5% 100% 59% 68%
2 33% 60% 43% 54% 23% 43%
3 56% 72% 9% 33% 34% 73%

Set to set −1.19 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.87 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Marcel Granollers

5.3 points left on the table across 161 shots 3.32 per 100 shots

  1. Return +1: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×2; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.42 pts
  2. Serve +1: short return to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.40 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: volley to your middle, opponent at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley down the line rates higher · 0.23 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts

Alexander Bublik

5.6 points left on the table across 170 shots 3.32 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 2nd serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×3; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.29 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
  3. Serve +1: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  4. Return +1: volley to your forehand side, opponent at net hit FH through the middle ×1; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.23 pts