Tour Finals · RR · Hard · 13 Nov 2019
Rafael Nadal v Daniil Medvedev
108–105 in points · Rafael Nadal won
Why it went the way it did
Rafael Nadal won 1.3 more points than Daniil Medvedev relative to what the serve alone predicted. Daniil Medvedev's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −2.8, net execution −2.6, forehand direction choices −2.2.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Rafael Nadal | Daniil Medvedev | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | +0.3 | −0.9 | −0.6 | +0.5 | −0.1 | +3.1 | +3.5 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.7 | +0.6 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +1.0 | +1.2 |
| Return | −0.3 | +1.2 | −2.8 | −1.8 | −0.4 | +0.9 | +0.7 | +1.2 |
| Forehand | ±0.0 | +1.7 | −1.6 | +0.2 | −2.2 | +0.3 | −2.2 | −4.1 |
| Backhand | −0.4 | −0.5 | +4.3 | +3.4 | −1.4 | −1.4 | +5.4 | +2.6 |
| Slice | −1.0 | −5.1 | ±0.0 | −6.1 | −0.3 | −2.8 | −2.0 | −5.1 |
| Net | +0.2 | +1.0 | +0.5 | +1.8 | −0.1 | +1.1 | −2.6 | −1.6 |
| Touch | −0.2 | −0.5 | +1.0 | +0.3 | ±0.0 | −0.4 | −0.1 | −0.5 |
| Other | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.6 | −0.1 | −0.7 |
| All shots | −1.6 | −1.9 | +1.3 | −2.3 | −3.8 | −2.9 | +3.1 | −3.6 |
Set by set
| Set | Rafael Nadal | Daniil Medvedev | Net, Rafael | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.8 | +3.1 | −4.0 | |
| 2 | +1.0 | −3.2 | +4.1 | |
| 3 | −2.4 | −3.5 | +1.1 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Rafael Nadal serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53% 65% | 5% 100% | 42% 75% |
| 2 | 45% 60% | 9% 50% | 45% 90% |
| 3 | 43% 60% | 17% 63% | 40% 63% |
Set to set −0.49 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.15 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Daniil Medvedev serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54% 79% | – | 46% 88% |
| 2 | 47% 64% | – | 53% 50% |
| 3 | 51% 52% | – | 49% 65% |
Set to set −0.39 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.15 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Rafael Nadal
14.3 points left on the table across 457 shots 3.13 per 100 shots
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court hit FH through the middle ×9; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.94 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×10; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.73 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×8; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.56 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.52 pts
Daniil Medvedev
14.7 points left on the table across 473 shots 3.11 per 100 shots
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×22; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.92 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×23; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.89 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.57 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.53 pts