Auckland · QF · Hard · 10 Jan 2020
Caroline Wozniacki v Julia Goerges
66–50 in points · Caroline Wozniacki won
Why it went the way it did
Caroline Wozniacki won 6.7 more points than Julia Goerges relative to what the serve alone predicted. Julia Goerges's biggest leaks: return execution −3.7, slice execution −0.8, slice shot selection −0.8.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Caroline Wozniacki | Julia Goerges | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.9 | +1.9 | +0.2 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.3 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.5 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.6 | −0.6 |
| Return | −0.2 | −0.2 | +1.7 | +1.3 | −0.4 | ±0.0 | −3.7 | −4.2 |
| Forehand | ±0.0 | +0.4 | +0.8 | +1.2 | +0.2 | +0.9 | −0.2 | +0.8 |
| Backhand | +0.2 | +0.4 | −0.7 | −0.1 | −0.2 | +1.3 | −0.5 | +0.6 |
| Slice | −0.1 | −1.4 | −0.2 | −1.7 | +0.2 | −0.8 | −0.8 | −1.4 |
| Net | −0.2 | +0.1 | +0.4 | +0.3 | +0.1 | +0.3 | ±0.0 | +0.4 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | −0.1 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.6 | +0.6 |
| All shots | −0.3 | −0.7 | +4.3 | +3.3 | ±0.0 | +1.8 | −5.2 | −3.4 |
Set by set
| Set | Caroline Wozniacki | Julia Goerges | Net, Caroline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +0.1 | −3.6 | +3.7 | |
| 2 | +3.2 | +0.2 | +3.0 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Caroline Wozniacki serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34% 50% | 26% 44% | 40% 86% |
| 2 | 44% 64% | 13% 75% | 44% 79% |
Set to set +0.30 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.25 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Julia Goerges serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35% 33% | 12% 100% | 53% 44% |
| 2 | 50% 63% | 9% 33% | 41% 69% |
Within sets +0.34 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Caroline Wozniacki
3.7 points left on the table across 128 shots 2.88 per 100 shots
- Return of a 2nd serve, wide, deuce court hit FH down the line ×3; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court, server rushing the net hit BH through the middle ×1; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.15 pts
Julia Goerges
4.6 points left on the table across 168 shots 2.74 per 100 shots
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, deuce court hit FH down the line ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.34 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, body, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×5; FH down the line rates higher · 0.24 pts
- Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit BH through the middle + approach ×1; BH crosscourt + approach rates higher · 0.21 pts