RallyIQ

Madrid · R32 · Clay · 1 May 2021

Veronika Kudermetova v Kiki Bertens

59–52 in points · Veronika Kudermetova won

Why it went the way it did

Veronika Kudermetova won 2.8 more points than Kiki Bertens relative to what the serve alone predicted. Kiki Bertens's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −2.9, slice execution −2.4, forehand execution −1.7.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotVeronika KudermetovaKiki Bertens
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.3 ±0.0 −1.0 −0.7 +0.3 ±0.0 −0.4 −0.1
Serve 2nd +0.1 ±0.0 −0.1 −0.1 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.8 −0.8
Return ±0.0 −0.3 −2.7 −3.0 ±0.0 −0.3 +0.5 +0.2
Forehand −0.4 +1.3 −0.1 +0.8 +0.3 +1.1 −1.7 −0.3
Backhand +0.1 −0.2 +1.3 +1.2 −0.2 +0.4 +1.0 +1.1
Slice +0.3 −1.9 +1.2 −0.3 ±0.0 −2.9 −2.4 −5.4
Net +0.2 +0.2 −0.2 +0.1 ±0.0 +0.2 +0.4 +0.6
Touch −0.1 −0.1 +0.3 +0.1 +0.1 +0.3 −0.4 −0.1
All shots +0.5−1.0 −1.4−1.9 +0.5−1.2 −3.9−4.6

Set by set

SetVeronika KudermetovaKiki BertensNet, Veronika
1−3.1−4.0 +0.9
2+1.3−0.6 +1.9

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Veronika Kudermetova serving

SetWideBodyT
1 55% 59% 6% 100% 39% 58%
2 52% 63% 10% 33% 39% 67%

Set to set +0.55 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.59 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Kiki Bertens serving

SetWideBodyT
1 41% 67% 3% 0% 55% 56%
2 50% 60% 10% 50% 40% 50%

Set to set −1.91 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.80 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Veronika Kudermetova

4.0 points left on the table across 177 shots 2.26 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.38 pts
  2. Return +1: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH down the line rates higher · 0.26 pts
  3. Return +1: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.21 pts

Kiki Bertens

4.3 points left on the table across 179 shots 2.41 per 100 shots

  1. Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×4; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
  4. Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit BH down the line ×3; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.21 pts