Australian Open · R16 · Hard · 23 Jan 2022
Gael Monfils v Miomir Kecmanovic
122–107 in points · Gael Monfils won
Why it went the way it did
Gael Monfils won 11.8 more points than Miomir Kecmanovic relative to what the serve alone predicted. Miomir Kecmanovic's biggest leaks: serve 1st execution −5.3, slice shot selection −3.4, touch shot selection −1.6.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Gael Monfils | Miomir Kecmanovic | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.8 | +1.7 | −1.1 | −0.2 | −5.3 | −6.6 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −0.4 | −0.5 | −0.2 | −0.1 | +0.7 | +0.4 |
| Return | +0.5 | +0.7 | +2.6 | +3.9 | +0.5 | −1.5 | +0.1 | −0.8 |
| Forehand | −0.8 | +2.2 | +0.1 | +1.5 | +0.3 | +3.7 | +7.4 | +11.4 |
| Backhand | +0.2 | +0.8 | +6.7 | +7.7 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.8 | +0.8 |
| Slice | +0.1 | −2.2 | −0.3 | −2.4 | +0.6 | −3.4 | −0.4 | −3.3 |
| Net | ±0.0 | +0.1 | −0.8 | −0.7 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | −0.8 | −0.4 |
| Touch | +0.1 | −0.3 | +1.0 | +0.8 | +0.1 | −1.6 | +0.3 | −1.2 |
| All shots | +0.2 | +1.2 | +10.6 | +12.1 | +0.5 | −3.1 | +2.8 | +0.3 |
Set by set
| Set | Gael Monfils | Miomir Kecmanovic | Net, Gael | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1.4 | −2.5 | +3.9 | |
| 2 | +5.9 | +2.7 | +3.2 | |
| 3 | +4.8 | ±0.0 | +4.7 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Gael Monfils serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38% 86% | 14% 60% | 49% 67% |
| 2 | 49% 53% | 8% 67% | 44% 76% |
| 3 | 46% 82% | 4% 100% | 50% 58% |
Set to set +1.03 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.91 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Miomir Kecmanovic serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37% 63% | 12% 60% | 51% 64% |
| 2 | 26% 42% | 36% 59% | 38% 67% |
| 3 | 31% 58% | 28% 36% | 41% 69% |
Set to set −0.98 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.59 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Gael Monfils
9.8 points left on the table across 509 shots 1.92 per 100 shots
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×13; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.71 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.51 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×12; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.50 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×8; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.46 pts
Miomir Kecmanovic
8.4 points left on the table across 475 shots 1.78 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×11; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.63 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.51 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.37 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.33 pts