Monastir · R32 · Hard · 4 Oct 2022
Mirra Andreeva v Anastasia Potapova
102–113 in points · Anastasia Potapova won
Why it went the way it did
Anastasia Potapova won 6.9 more points than Mirra Andreeva relative to what the serve alone predicted. Mirra Andreeva's biggest leaks: touch shot selection −6.9, slice shot selection −3.5, serve 1st execution −1.3.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Mirra Andreeva | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | −1.1 | ±0.0 | −1.3 | −2.3 | −0.4 | ±0.0 | −1.5 | −2.0 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.4 | +1.5 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.8 | −0.7 |
| Return | +0.2 | +0.2 | +1.2 | +1.6 | +0.6 | +1.2 | +0.7 | +2.5 |
| Forehand | −0.6 | +2.4 | −1.2 | +0.5 | +0.7 | +1.8 | −3.7 | −1.2 |
| Backhand | −0.1 | +1.4 | +6.4 | +7.7 | +1.8 | +1.1 | +7.7 | +10.5 |
| Slice | −0.2 | −3.5 | +0.6 | −3.1 | +0.1 | −0.8 | −1.1 | −1.7 |
| Net | +0.1 | +0.3 | −0.3 | ±0.0 | −0.1 | +0.2 | +0.4 | +0.5 |
| Touch | +0.5 | −6.9 | −0.2 | −6.6 | ±0.0 | −2.4 | +0.5 | −1.8 |
| All shots | −1.1 | −6.2 | +6.6 | −0.7 | +2.8 | +1.2 | +2.2 | +6.1 |
Set by set
| Set | Mirra Andreeva | Anastasia Potapova | Net, Mirra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1.3 | +3.6 | −4.9 | |
| 2 | +3.7 | +1.4 | +2.3 | |
| 3 | −3.2 | +1.2 | −4.3 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Mirra Andreeva serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21% 57% | 56% 58% | 24% 25% |
| 2 | 42% 63% | 27% 75% | 31% 36% |
| 3 | 24% 50% | 42% 43% | 33% 55% |
Set to set −2.05 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.91 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Anastasia Potapova serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37% 64% | 27% 75% | 37% 55% |
| 2 | 51% 60% | 31% 47% | 18% 44% |
| 3 | 36% 50% | 27% 83% | 36% 63% |
Set to set +1.52 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.21 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Mirra Andreeva
14.0 points left on the table across 564 shots 2.48 per 100 shots
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×24; BH crosscourt rates higher · 1.25 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×28; BH crosscourt rates higher · 1.20 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×13; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.71 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.55 pts
Anastasia Potapova
10.3 points left on the table across 573 shots 1.80 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×9; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.63 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×13; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.56 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH down the line rates higher · 0.42 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, wide, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×3; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.34 pts