RallyIQ

Roland Garros · R128 · Clay · 26 May 2024

Richard Gasquet v Borna Coric

127–109 in points · Richard Gasquet won

Why it went the way it did

Richard Gasquet won 9.5 more points than Borna Coric relative to what the serve alone predicted. Borna Coric's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −2.4, touch shot selection −0.8, backhand shot selection −0.8.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotRichard GasquetBorna Coric
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.4 ±0.0 −1.7 −1.3 +0.4 +0.4 +1.3 +2.1
Serve 2nd +0.2 ±0.0 −0.1 +0.1 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.4 −0.4
Return +0.8 −1.0 ±0.0 −0.2 +0.1 +1.1 −0.8 +0.4
Forehand +0.7 +3.2 +7.0 +10.9 +0.9 +5.3 +2.0 +8.3
Backhand +0.8 −0.7 +11.9 +12.1 +0.3 −0.8 +0.7 +0.2
Slice +0.8 −4.1 +0.8 −2.5 +0.2 −2.4 +1.0 −1.2
Net +0.1 +0.2 +1.0 +1.3 +0.9 +0.1 +1.3 +2.4
Touch ±0.0 −0.1 +0.8 +0.8 −0.1 −0.8 +0.9 ±0.0
All shots +3.8−2.3 +19.7+21.2 +2.6+2.9 +6.2+11.7

Set by set

SetRichard GasquetBorna CoricNet, Richard
1+6.6+4.9 +1.8
2+7.1−1.0 +8.1
3+7.4+7.9 −0.4

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Richard Gasquet serving

SetWideBodyT
1 51% 81% – 49% 60%
2 58% 78% – 42% 100%
3 54% 64% 2% 0% 44% 61%

Set to set +0.30 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.15 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Borna Coric serving

SetWideBodyT
1 46% 72% – 54% 62%
2 53% 62% – 47% 61%
3 38% 64% 3% 100% 59% 59%

Set to set −0.71 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.08 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Richard Gasquet

11.5 points left on the table across 525 shots 2.18 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×7; FH inside-in rates higher · 1.14 pts
  2. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH down the line ×5; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.92 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.51 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.34 pts

Borna Coric

11.5 points left on the table across 535 shots 2.16 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×6; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.98 pts
  2. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH down the line ×4; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.73 pts
  3. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH crosscourt ×3; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.59 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×15; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.58 pts