Davis Cup Finals · QF · Hard · 19 Nov 2024
Rafael Nadal v Botic Van De Zandschulp
64–74 in points · Botic Van De Zandschulp won
Why it went the way it did
Botic Van De Zandschulp won 5.5 more points than Rafael Nadal relative to what the serve alone predicted. Rafael Nadal's biggest leaks: forehand execution −4.8, serve 1st execution −3.2, slice shot selection −2.0.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Rafael Nadal | Botic Van De Zandschulp | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | +0.2 | +0.7 | −3.2 | −2.3 | −0.4 | ±0.0 | +0.3 | −0.1 |
| Serve 2nd | −0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.4 | −0.5 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −4.1 | −4.1 |
| Return | ±0.0 | +0.2 | −1.3 | −1.1 | −0.2 | +0.8 | −0.1 | +0.5 |
| Forehand | −0.1 | +2.8 | −4.8 | −2.1 | +0.1 | +1.9 | +2.2 | +4.2 |
| Backhand | −0.1 | +0.3 | −0.3 | −0.1 | −0.6 | +1.2 | −3.1 | −2.5 |
| Slice | −0.4 | −2.0 | +0.3 | −2.1 | ±0.0 | −2.4 | +0.4 | −2.0 |
| Net | −0.6 | +0.1 | −0.5 | −1.0 | +0.2 | +0.2 | +0.9 | +1.3 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.1 | −0.1 | −0.9 | −0.6 | −1.6 |
| Other | ±0.0 | −0.6 | +0.1 | −0.5 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 |
| All shots | −1.2 | +1.4 | −9.9 | −9.7 | −0.9 | +0.8 | −4.0 | −4.2 |
Set by set
| Set | Rafael Nadal | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Net, Rafael | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −2.4 | +0.2 | −2.6 | |
| 2 | −7.3 | −4.4 | −2.9 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Rafael Nadal serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53% 75% | 3% 0% | 43% 54% |
| 2 | 52% 59% | 7% 67% | 40% 41% |
Set to set +4.33 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +2.01 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Botic Van De Zandschulp serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45% 77% | 17% 100% | 38% 55% |
| 2 | 36% 46% | 28% 50% | 36% 77% |
Set to set −2.29 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.33 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Rafael Nadal
7.8 points left on the table across 236 shots 3.29 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: lob to your backhand side, you at net hit Smash through the middle ×2; Smash inside-in rates higher · 0.43 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit FH down the line ×2; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.33 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice down the line ×6; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.33 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley down the line rates higher · 0.32 pts
Botic Van De Zandschulp
7.2 points left on the table across 256 shots 2.83 per 100 shots
- Return of a 2nd serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×3; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.28 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×7; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×6; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court, server rushing the net hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts