Montreal · R16 · Hard · 3 Aug 2025
Iga Swiatek v Clara Tauson
64–77 in points · Clara Tauson won
Why it went the way it did
Clara Tauson won 5.1 more points than Iga Swiatek relative to what the serve alone predicted. Iga Swiatek's biggest leaks: forehand execution −3.6, backhand execution −1.3, slice shot selection −1.1.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Iga Swiatek | Clara Tauson | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | −0.2 | ±0.0 | +1.4 | +1.2 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.2 | +0.4 |
| Serve 2nd | −0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.9 | −1.0 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.6 | +0.6 |
| Return | +0.2 | ±0.0 | −0.7 | −0.5 | +0.1 | −1.4 | +2.9 | +1.6 |
| Forehand | +0.4 | +1.1 | −3.6 | −2.2 | +0.1 | +0.8 | ±0.0 | +0.8 |
| Backhand | +0.1 | +0.1 | −1.3 | −1.0 | +0.1 | +0.4 | −0.1 | +0.4 |
| Slice | ±0.0 | −1.1 | +0.5 | −0.6 | −0.2 | −3.7 | +1.7 | −2.1 |
| Net | +0.1 | +0.3 | +0.2 | +0.6 | −0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.7 | +0.7 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.8 | −0.6 |
| All shots | +0.6 | +0.4 | −4.4 | −3.4 | +0.3 | −3.8 | +5.2 | +1.6 |
Set by set
| Set | Iga Swiatek | Clara Tauson | Net, Iga | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.5 | +0.8 | −1.3 | |
| 2 | −3.0 | +0.9 | −3.8 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Iga Swiatek serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31% 75% | 23% 33% | 46% 61% |
| 2 | 41% 67% | 27% 33% | 32% 43% |
Set to set −0.21 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.24 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Clara Tauson serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41% 70% | 22% 45% | 37% 61% |
| 2 | 58% 67% | 6% 50% | 35% 64% |
Set to set +1.99 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.17 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Iga Swiatek
4.2 points left on the table across 203 shots 2.04 per 100 shots
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, wide, ad court hit BH through the middle ×4; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.19 pts
- Return +1: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH down the line rates higher · 0.19 pts
Clara Tauson
5.1 points left on the table across 180 shots 2.83 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: volley to your backhand side, opponent at net hit BH slice through the middle ×2; BH slice down the line rates higher · 0.32 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×4; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts