Australian Open · R64 · Hard · 21 Jan 2026
Hamad Medjedovic v Alex De Minaur
107–140 in points · Alex De Minaur won
Why it went the way it did
Alex De Minaur won 20.6 more points than Hamad Medjedovic relative to what the serve alone predicted. Hamad Medjedovic's biggest leaks: touch execution −5.1, serve 2nd execution −3.5, slice shot selection −3.5.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Hamad Medjedovic | Alex De Minaur | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.2 | ±0.0 | −0.2 | +0.3 | +0.2 |
| Serve 2nd | −0.1 | ±0.0 | −3.5 | −3.6 | −0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.7 | −0.9 |
| Return | −0.3 | −0.1 | −0.9 | −1.3 | +0.3 | +0.5 | −0.2 | +0.6 |
| Forehand | −0.7 | +0.8 | −3.3 | −3.1 | −1.0 | +2.3 | −1.2 | ±0.0 |
| Backhand | +0.1 | +1.3 | −3.2 | −1.9 | −0.3 | +0.2 | +3.9 | +3.8 |
| Slice | +0.2 | −3.5 | +0.2 | −3.1 | +0.1 | −5.5 | +2.3 | −3.0 |
| Net | +0.2 | +0.2 | −2.1 | −1.7 | −0.3 | +0.4 | −0.1 | ±0.0 |
| Touch | +0.2 | −1.3 | −5.1 | −6.1 | +0.1 | −0.9 | ±0.0 | −0.9 |
| All shots | −0.3 | −2.6 | −17.8 | −20.7 | −1.2 | −3.3 | +4.3 | −0.1 |
Set by set
| Set | Hamad Medjedovic | Alex De Minaur | Net, Hamad | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −3.0 | −5.3 | +2.2 | |
| 2 | −5.7 | −1.0 | −4.6 | |
| 3 | −3.8 | +3.1 | −6.9 | |
| 4 | −8.2 | +3.1 | −11.3 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Hamad Medjedovic serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30% 91% | 14% 80% | 57% 67% |
| 2 | 29% 33% | 6% 0% | 65% 65% |
| 3 | 33% 33% | 7% 0% | 59% 50% |
| 4 | 36% 50% | 3% 100% | 62% 46% |
Set to set −0.12 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.08 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Alex De Minaur serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40% 76% | 7% 33% | 52% 68% |
| 2 | 37% 73% | 17% 100% | 47% 50% |
| 3 | 48% 70% | – | 52% 64% |
| 4 | 53% 100% | 6% 100% | 41% 86% |
Set to set +0.39 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.24 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Hamad Medjedovic
10.3 points left on the table across 436 shots 2.36 per 100 shots
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.52 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.40 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH slice through the middle ×5; FH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.32 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
Alex De Minaur
10.7 points left on the table across 422 shots 2.54 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×13; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.50 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×8; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.44 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.36 pts
- Return +1: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.35 pts