Montpellier · R32 · Hard · 3 Feb 2026
Martin Damm v Hubert Hurkacz
74–69 in points · Martin Damm won
Why it went the way it did
Martin Damm won 2.6 more points than Hubert Hurkacz relative to what the serve alone predicted. Hubert Hurkacz's biggest leaks: forehand execution −2.1, slice shot selection −2.0, return execution −1.8.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Martin Damm | Hubert Hurkacz | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | +0.2 | +0.1 | +1.1 | +1.4 | +0.1 | −0.1 | +1.1 | +1.1 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.5 | −0.5 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.6 | +1.6 |
| Return | −0.2 | ±0.0 | −3.1 | −3.2 | −0.1 | −1.4 | −1.8 | −3.2 |
| Forehand | −0.1 | +0.9 | −1.7 | −0.9 | +0.1 | +1.6 | −2.1 | −0.5 |
| Backhand | +0.2 | +0.5 | −0.6 | +0.1 | −0.2 | +0.6 | −1.0 | −0.6 |
| Slice | −0.3 | −0.9 | +0.4 | −0.8 | ±0.0 | −2.0 | +0.1 | −1.8 |
| Net | ±0.0 | +0.4 | −0.8 | −0.3 | ±0.0 | −0.2 | −0.7 | −0.9 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | +0.3 | ±0.0 | +0.3 | −0.1 | −0.6 | −1.2 | −1.9 |
| Other | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −0.1 | −0.2 | −0.1 | −0.4 |
| All shots | −0.2 | +1.4 | −5.3 | −4.0 | −0.3 | −2.3 | −4.1 | −6.6 |
Set by set
| Set | Martin Damm | Hubert Hurkacz | Net, Martin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −2.9 | −5.1 | +2.2 | |
| 2 | −1.1 | −1.5 | +0.4 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Martin Damm serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53% 81% | 5% 50% | 43% 65% |
| 2 | 55% 76% | 3% 0% | 42% 69% |
Set to set +0.72 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.91 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Hubert Hurkacz serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47% 71% | 4% 100% | 49% 59% |
| 2 | 67% 67% | 11% 100% | 22% 67% |
Set to set +2.54 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.24 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Martin Damm
5.9 points left on the table across 157 shots 3.78 per 100 shots
- Serve +1: short return to your forehand side hit FH through the middle + approach ×3; FH down the line + approach rates higher · 0.44 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley down the line ×3; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.36 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
- Return of a 2nd serve, wide, ad court hit FH through the middle ×3; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.26 pts
Hubert Hurkacz
4.2 points left on the table across 150 shots 2.78 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: slice to your middle, opponent at net hit BH through the middle ×1; BH down the line rates higher · 0.25 pts
- Return +1: slice to your backhand side, opponent at net hit BH lob down the line ×1; BH lob crosscourt rates higher · 0.23 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court hit BH slice through the middle ×3; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.23 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×2; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.17 pts