Dubai · QF · Hard · 19 Feb 2026
Alexandra Eala v Coco Gauff
33–55 in points · Coco Gauff won
Why it went the way it did
Coco Gauff won 10.4 more points than Alexandra Eala relative to what the serve alone predicted. Alexandra Eala's biggest leaks: forehand execution −3.9, serve 1st execution −1.0, net execution −0.9.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Alexandra Eala | Coco Gauff | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −1.0 | −0.9 | −0.6 | ±0.0 | −0.6 | −1.2 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +0.7 | +0.6 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −2.7 | −2.7 |
| Return | −0.3 | +0.2 | −0.3 | −0.4 | ±0.0 | +0.6 | +3.0 | +3.5 |
| Forehand | +0.3 | +1.5 | −3.9 | −2.2 | +0.3 | +1.1 | +5.8 | +7.1 |
| Backhand | −0.2 | +0.4 | +2.2 | +2.3 | −0.5 | +0.7 | +3.0 | +3.1 |
| Slice | ±0.0 | −0.5 | ±0.0 | −0.5 | −0.2 | −2.0 | −0.5 | −2.7 |
| Net | −0.1 | +0.2 | −0.9 | −0.8 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 |
| Touch | +0.1 | −0.3 | −0.4 | −0.6 | ±0.0 | −0.4 | +1.3 | +0.9 |
| All shots | −0.1 | +1.4 | −3.6 | −2.3 | −1.1 | −0.1 | +9.3 | +8.1 |
Set by set
| Set | Alexandra Eala | Coco Gauff | Net, Alexandra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1.9 | +5.5 | −7.4 | |
| 2 | −0.5 | +2.5 | −3.0 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Alexandra Eala serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28% 40% | 11% 0% | 61% 27% |
| 2 | 32% 43% | 9% 50% | 59% 38% |
Within sets +1.22 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Coco Gauff serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32% 83% | 42% 63% | 26% 60% |
| 2 | 38% 45% | 52% 73% | 10% 0% |
Within sets +0.44 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Alexandra Eala
5.7 points left on the table across 217 shots 2.65 per 100 shots
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×6; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH down the line rates higher · 0.28 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
Coco Gauff
5.5 points left on the table across 212 shots 2.59 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×11; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.47 pts
- Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×6; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.29 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts