RallyIQ

Indian Wells · R64 · Hard · 6 Mar 2026

Linda Noskova v Jessica Bouzas Maneiro

69–47 in points · Linda Noskova won

Why it went the way it did

Linda Noskova won 10.6 more points than Jessica Bouzas Maneiro relative to what the serve alone predicted. Jessica Bouzas Maneiro's biggest leaks: backhand execution −1.6, serve 1st execution −1.5, return shot selection −1.4.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotLinda NoskovaJessica Bouzas Maneiro
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.4 ±0.0 +0.6 +1.1 +0.2 ±0.0 −1.5 −1.3
Serve 2nd ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.7 −0.7 +0.1 ±0.0 +0.4 +0.5
Return −0.1 −0.2 +1.2 +0.8 ±0.0 −1.4 −1.0 −2.5
Forehand +0.4 +0.6 +5.3 +6.4 −0.1 +0.6 +2.8 +3.3
Backhand ±0.0 +0.1 −0.7 −0.6 −0.7 +0.7 −1.6 −1.6
Slice ±0.0 −0.8 +0.8 −0.1 −0.3 −1.2 −0.3 −1.9
Net ±0.0 +0.1 +1.1 +1.1 ±0.0 +0.2 +0.3 +0.5
Touch +0.2 −0.3 −0.4 −0.5 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0
All shots +1.0−0.5 +7.2+7.6 −0.9−1.2 −0.9−3.0

Set by set

SetLinda NoskovaJessica Bouzas ManeiroNet, Linda
1+4.6−0.5 +5.1
2+3.0−2.4 +5.4

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Linda Noskova serving

SetWideBodyT
1 40% 67% – 60% 67%
2 58% 73% 4% 0% 38% 70%

Set to set +3.26 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.57 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Jessica Bouzas Maneiro serving

SetWideBodyT
1 44% 45% 16% 75% 40% 40%
2 50% 56% 13% 50% 38% 42%

Within sets −0.48 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Linda Noskova

4.0 points left on the table across 151 shots 2.66 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 2nd serve, wide, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×7; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.80 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.24 pts
  3. Return +1: drive to your middle hit BH through the middle ×4; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.18 pts
  4. Return of a 2nd serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×2; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.16 pts

Jessica Bouzas Maneiro

4.8 points left on the table across 140 shots 3.40 per 100 shots

  1. Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit BH through the middle ×5; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
  2. Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  3. Return of a 1st serve, wide, ad court hit BH down the line ×2; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.19 pts
  4. Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×3; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.18 pts