RallyIQ

Indian Wells Masters · SF · Hard · 14 Mar 2026

Alexander Zverev v Jannik Sinner

46–58 in points · Jannik Sinner won

Why it went the way it did

Jannik Sinner won 6.3 more points than Alexander Zverev relative to what the serve alone predicted. Alexander Zverev's biggest leaks: return execution −2.7, backhand execution −2.1, serve 2nd execution −0.9.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotAlexander ZverevJannik Sinner
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.1 −0.1 −0.6 −0.6 +0.1 −0.1 +0.1 +0.1
Serve 2nd ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.9 −0.9 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.2 −0.2
Return ±0.0 +0.2 −2.7 −2.4 −0.2 +0.1 −3.5 −3.6
Forehand −0.5 +0.4 +0.1 −0.1 −0.1 +0.9 +0.1 +0.9
Backhand −0.3 −0.2 −2.1 −2.6 −0.2 −0.3 +2.2 +1.7
Slice +0.1 −0.7 +0.1 −0.6 ±0.0 −0.6 −0.2 −0.8
Net ±0.0 +0.1 +0.4 +0.6 +0.3 +0.3 +0.8 +1.4
Touch ±0.0 −0.2 +0.1 −0.1 ±0.0 −0.1 +0.3 +0.2
All shots −0.6−0.5 −5.6−6.6 −0.2+0.2 −0.3−0.3

Set by set

SetAlexander ZverevJannik SinnerNet, Alexander
1−4.0±0.0 −4.0
2−2.6−0.3 −2.3

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Alexander Zverev serving

SetWideBodyT
1 60% 50% 5% 100% 35% 71%
2 42% 64% 3% 0% 55% 67%

Within sets −0.38 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Jannik Sinner serving

SetWideBodyT
1 55% 73% – 45% 89%
2 45% 79% 10% 67% 45% 64%

Within sets +0.92 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Alexander Zverev

4.5 points left on the table across 187 shots 2.42 per 100 shots

  1. Return +1: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.29 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×6; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.23 pts
  4. Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.21 pts

Jannik Sinner

4.0 points left on the table across 184 shots 2.17 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.25 pts
  4. Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts