RallyIQ

Game plan

Varvara Gracheva v Yue Yuan

Every number combines what Varvara Gracheva does well with what Yue Yuan allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Varvara Gracheva wins, best of 3 67%90%: 31%–91% · best of 5: 71%
Serve points won 55.9% / 52.7% Varvara / Yue · tour 56.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 67%serve 55.9% / 52.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Varvara Gracheva's record against Yue Yuan's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerVarvaraYue
Direction choice+0.06 ±0.12
better than 65%
−0.12 ±0.13
better than 32%
Shot selection+0.04 ±0.19
better than 49%
+0.42 ±0.17
better than 91%
Execution−0.42 ±0.65
better than 37%
−0.34 ±0.54
better than 41%
Points left on the table2.32 ±0.17
lower than 84%
2.45 ±0.23
lower than 69%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Varvara Gracheva serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowVarvara winsv YueMatchupOptimal
Wide40%64%69%67.4%±8.940%
Body30%52%67%62.4%±10.515% ▼
T30%64%75%71.4%±10.545% ▲

Optimal v Yue Yuan: +0.5±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowVarvara winsv YueMatchupOptimal
Wide35%60%65%59.6%±10.750% ▲
Body27%48%58%49.1%±12.512% ▼
T38%56%67%58.7%±10.838%

Optimal v Yue Yuan: +0.7±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Yue Yuan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYue winsv VarvaraMatchupOptimal
Wide42%60%65%58.7%±9.257% ▲
Body26%58%51%51.5%±11.411% ▼
T33%63%66%61.7%±10.832%

Optimal v Varvara Gracheva: +0.9±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYue winsv VarvaraMatchupOptimal
Wide43%64%62%61.0%±9.747% ▲
Body29%61%60%65.0%±10.419% ▼
T28%59%66%60.8%±10.634% ▲

Optimal v Varvara Gracheva: ±0.0±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Varvara Gracheva returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YueValue
FH through the middle46%+4.2+1.0−0.2+4.9±2.9
FH crosscourt22%+5.3+0.4+0.7+6.4±4.4
FH down the line16%+1.5−1.7−0.4−0.5±4.7
FH slice through the middle9%−6.7−0.7+0.4−7.1±2.3
FH slice crosscourt5%−6.6+1.0+0.4−5.2±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (223 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YueValue
BH through the middle42%+6.0+0.8−1.3+5.6±2.8
BH crosscourt32%+7.7+2.2+0.6+10.5±3.7
BH down the line10%+2.2−0.7−4.2−2.8±4.4
BH slice through the middle9%−6.2−0.6±0.0−6.8±1.6
BH slice crosscourt7%−4.2+0.1±0.0−4.1±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.0±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (183 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YueValue
FH through the middle44%−3.2−0.3+1.3−2.1±2.9
FH crosscourt41%+0.5−1.5+0.4−0.6±4.2
FH down the line15%−0.6+2.8+1.3+3.5±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: ±0.0±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (41 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YueValue
BH through the middle45%−2.6+0.2+0.4−2.0±2.8
BH crosscourt38%+1.5+1.4+2.2+5.1±3.7
BH down the line16%−0.5−0.9+5.8+4.4±4.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.3±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (99 returns charted)

Yue Yuan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VarvaraValue
FH through the middle50%+4.2+0.7+3.3+8.1±2.9
FH crosscourt34%+5.3−0.2−2.1+3.1±4.4
FH down the line15%+1.5−0.9+1.1+1.8±4.6

Lean FH through the middle: +2.7±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (155 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VarvaraValue
BH through the middle53%+6.0+3.0+0.3+9.4±2.8
BH crosscourt26%+7.7+1.5+0.8+10.1±3.6
BH down the line21%+2.2−0.7−0.1+1.4±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (117 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VarvaraValue
FH through the middle56%−3.2−0.6+0.6−3.2±3.0
FH crosscourt33%+0.5+0.5+3.2+4.2±4.1
FH down the line11%−0.6+3.4+0.5+3.3±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (45 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VarvaraValue
BH through the middle50%−2.6−0.8−0.1−3.4±2.7
BH crosscourt35%+1.5−1.5−1.1−1.1±3.4
BH down the line15%−0.5−0.7−2.5−3.7±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (52 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Varvara Gracheva

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.3±4.1−1.5+4.8
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.0±2.8−0.3+3.3
FH to their backhand · rally+2.6±3.5−0.7+3.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.1±4.3−0.7+2.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.1±3.5+0.6+1.5
BH to their backhand · return+2.0±3.4+0.3+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−2.6±4.5−3.5+0.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.3±4.0+0.4−2.7
BH to the middle · serve +1−0.9±2.6−0.1−0.8
FH to their forehand · rally−0.8±2.8−2.1+1.3
FH to the middle · return +1−0.6±2.8−1.9+1.3

Yue Yuan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally+3.2±2.9+1.6+1.6
FH to the middle · return+2.9±2.6−0.4+3.3
BH to the middle · return+1.3±2.4+1.0+0.4
FH to their backhand · rally+1.3±3.5−1.9+3.2
FH to their forehand · return+1.2±4.4+0.7+0.5
FH to the middle · rally+1.1±2.3−0.1+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.3±4.1−4.4−1.0
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.4±3.6+0.3−1.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.2±4.0−0.3−1.0
BH to their forehand · rally−0.8±4.6−2.1+1.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.7±3.7−2.4+1.7

Against Yue Yuan-like opponents

Varvara Gracheva vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–50.8%43.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Iva Jovic, Anastasia Potapova, Anna Blinkova, Jasmine Paolini, Maya Joint, Emma Raducanu, Nao Hibino, Anett Kontaveit, Andrea Petkovic. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.