RallyIQ

Game plan

Veronika Kudermetova v Clara Tauson

Every number combines what Veronika Kudermetova does well with what Clara Tauson allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Veronika Kudermetova wins, best of 3 37%90%: 15%–64% · best of 5: 34%
Serve points won 57.7% / 60.2% Veronika / Clara · tour 56.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 40%serve 58.1% / 60.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Veronika Kudermetova's record against Clara Tauson's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −2.1 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (860 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerVeronikaClara
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.06
better than 73%
+0.21 ±0.06
better than 88%
Shot selection+0.10 ±0.11
better than 55%
−0.45 ±0.14
better than 12%
Execution−0.90 ±0.37
better than 21%
+0.95 ±0.46
better than 90%
Points left on the table2.41 ±0.11
lower than 75%
2.46 ±0.09
lower than 68%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Veronika Kudermetova −1.51, Clara Tauson −0.12. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Veronika Kudermetova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowVeronika winsv ClaraMatchupOptimal
Wide39%63%68%65.7%±5.439%
Body16%53%55%50.9%±8.21% ▼
T45%75%67%74.6%±4.960% ▲

Optimal v Clara Tauson: +1.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +7.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowVeronika winsv ClaraMatchupOptimal
Wide41%72%66%72.2%±5.256% ▲
Body17%53%56%52.5%±8.62% ▼
T42%60%67%62.6%±5.942%

Optimal v Clara Tauson: +1.0±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +7.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Clara Tauson serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowClara winsv VeronikaMatchupOptimal
Wide42%72%68%73.7%±4.858% ▲
Body13%56%62%60.1%±7.60% ▼
T44%73%70%75.7%±5.042% ▼

Optimal v Veronika Kudermetova: +1.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowClara winsv VeronikaMatchupOptimal
Wide40%73%67%74.2%±5.355% ▲
Body10%57%58%58.3%±8.90% ▼
T50%66%66%67.4%±5.245% ▼

Optimal v Veronika Kudermetova: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Veronika Kudermetova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ClaraValue
FH through the middle44%+4.2−3.1−0.9+0.1±2.3
FH crosscourt30%+5.3−3.1−3.1−0.9±3.8
FH down the line17%+1.5−2.9−1.7−3.1±4.3
FH slice through the middle5%−6.7−0.6−0.4−7.7±2.4
FH slice crosscourt3%−6.6−0.3−0.4−7.3±2.6

Lean FH through the middle: +1.6±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (630 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ClaraValue
BH through the middle48%+6.0−1.4−0.7+3.9±2.1
BH crosscourt29%+7.7−2.2±0.0+5.5±3.1
BH down the line13%+2.2−1.7−3.7−3.3±4.6
BH slice through the middle4%−6.2−1.2−0.8−8.3±2.4
BH slice crosscourt4%−4.2−3.0−0.7−7.9±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.2±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (502 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ClaraValue
FH crosscourt45%+0.5−3.4−0.6−3.5±4.3
FH through the middle45%−3.2−2.7+1.1−4.8±2.8
FH down the line7%−0.6+2.0−3.6−2.1±4.6
BH through the middle3%−1.0+0.6+1.1+0.7±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.4±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (166 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ClaraValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.5+1.3+2.4+5.2±3.0
BH through the middle39%−2.6+0.1+1.1−1.4±2.3
BH down the line12%−0.5−2.1+3.9+1.3±5.1
FH inside-out2%+1.4+0.9−3.6−1.4±3.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.2±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (290 returns charted)

Clara Tauson returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
FH through the middle44%+4.2−1.6−0.1+2.5±2.3
FH crosscourt24%+5.3−0.2+1.0+6.1±3.9
FH slice through the middle15%−6.7−1.1−0.6−8.3±2.4
FH down the line9%+1.5−1.7+2.0+1.8±4.5
FH slice crosscourt6%−6.6+0.5+0.1−6.0±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (658 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
BH through the middle41%+6.0+1.9−1.1+6.8±2.0
BH crosscourt24%+7.7+1.0−1.6+7.1±3.1
BH slice through the middle16%−6.2+0.8−2.7−8.1±2.5
BH down the line9%+2.2+3.0−2.8+2.3±4.6
BH slice crosscourt8%−4.2−0.7−4.4−9.2±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (723 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
FH through the middle42%−3.2−0.1−0.4−3.6±2.9
FH crosscourt37%+0.5+2.5−1.4+1.7±4.3
FH down the line16%−0.6+0.5−0.6−0.6±5.0
FH slice through the middle5%−15.2−0.4−1.6−17.2±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (154 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
BH crosscourt39%+1.5−1.4+1.1+1.3±2.9
BH through the middle38%−2.6−0.1−0.5−3.2±2.2
BH down the line16%−0.5+1.9−1.5−0.1±5.0
BH slice through the middle5%−11.7−0.2±0.0−11.9±1.5
BH slice crosscourt3%−7.5−2.5±0.0−9.9±1.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (386 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Veronika Kudermetova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.1±3.6+0.5+1.6
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.5±4.3−0.1+1.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.4±2.9+0.2+1.2
BH slice to their backhand · rally+1.3±2.8−1.5+2.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±3.9±0.0+1.1
FH to their forehand · rally+0.7±2.1−0.6+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−5.5±3.3−3.2−2.3
BH to their forehand · rally−4.9±3.3−5.9+1.0
FH to their backhand · return−3.9±3.6−1.0−3.0
FH to the middle · return−3.7±1.8−3.3−0.4
BH to the middle · rally−3.3±1.7−1.4−1.9

Clara Tauson

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+3.2±3.6−0.6+3.8
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.9±4.5+1.1+1.8
BH to the middle · return +1+2.0±2.2+0.8+1.1
FH to their forehand · return+1.8±3.4+2.4−0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.6±3.6+2.4−0.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.4±2.8+2.6−1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−3.0±2.5−0.9−2.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1−2.9±4.4−1.5−1.4
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.7±2.2−1.0−1.7
FH to the middle · rally−2.6±1.8−2.7+0.1
BH slice to the middle · return−2.0±2.4+0.4−2.3

Against Clara Tauson-like opponents

Veronika Kudermetova vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.0%41.7%
Players most similar to Clara Tauson5 57.0%39.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Karolina Pliskova, Rebecca Sramkova, Linda Noskova, Barbora Krejcikova, Viktoria Hruncakova, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, Sofia Kenin, Anett Kontaveit, Sabine Lisicki. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.