RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 2009–2010

Alisa Kleybanova

Shot expected value

The share of points Alisa Kleybanova goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 87 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 56% 46.9%±9.9 46.7%
FH through the middle 25% 34.0%±12.0 41.3%
FH down the line 18% 47.2%±13.7 44.9%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 47 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 57% 41.5%±11.8 47.6%
BH through the middle 21% 45.5%±15.0 43.3%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 46% 67% ▲ 68% / 66%
Body 16% 0% ▼ 57% / 57%
T 38% 33% 68% / 68%

92 normal · 3 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 26% 21% 68% / 66%
Body 17% 11% 54% / 56%
T 57% 68% ▲ 65% / 64%

70 normal · 19 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide46% 59.3%±9.4 n=44
Body16% 57.3%±12.1 n=15
T38% 59.6%±9.9 n=36

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.92).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide25% 53.4%±11.4 n=22
Body16% 47.7%±12.4 n=14
T60% 57.6%±8.9 n=53

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.21).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 4 39% −5.2±13.7
1stAd courtT 30 33% −2.8±10.0
1stAd courtWide 16 31% −3.3±11.2
1stDeuce courtBody 5 42% −0.4±13.7
1stDeuce courtT 18 35% +2.5±11.3
1stDeuce courtWide 33 24% −9.9±8.9
2ndAd courtBody 7 61% +5.8±13.2
2ndAd courtT 9 55% +0.1±13.1
2ndAd courtWide 13 44% −9.2±12.5
2ndDeuce courtBody 15 56% +1.8±12.2
2ndDeuce courtT 10 57% +1.0±12.9
2ndDeuce courtWide 3 58% +4.2±14.1

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Alisa Kleybanova wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 3.7% · won 48% · +3.5±12.8 vs own baseline · +5.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Jelena Dokic (8/15)
  2. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 4.6% · won 44% · −0.7±12.1 vs own baseline · −5.4 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Jelena Dokic (7/17)
  3. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH through the middle used 4.3% · won 40% · −4.2±12.1 vs own baseline · −8.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Jelena Dokic (7/18)

Charted matches