RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 2024–2026

Berfu Cengiz

Shot expected value

The share of points Berfu Cengiz goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 42 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 43% 59.3%±13.1 52.7%
BH crosscourt 29% 47.4%±14.5 50.9%
FH down the line 29% 54.5%±14.5 52.2%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 43% 20% ▼ 64% / 66%
Body 26% 60% ▲ 66% / 57%
T 31% 20% ▼ 69% / 68%

65 normal · 5 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 54% 36% ▼ 60% / 66%
Body 29% 27% 61% / 56%
T 17% 36% ▲ 67% / 64%

52 normal · 11 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide41% 59.2%±10.5 n=29
Body29% 69.7%±10.7 n=20
T30% 60.5%±11.3 n=21

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.18).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide51% 48.3%±10.4 n=32
Body29% 56.9%±11.8 n=18
T21% 47.5%±12.5 n=13

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.26).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 15 43% −1.3±12.1
1stAd courtT 8 39% +3.0±13.0
1stAd courtWide 18 38% +3.7±11.5
1stDeuce courtBody 18 50% +6.9±11.9
1stDeuce courtT 13 36% +4.2±12.1
1stDeuce courtWide 14 44% +9.6±12.3
2ndAd courtBody 12 56% +0.9±12.6
2ndAd courtWide 8 53% −0.7±13.3
2ndDeuce courtBody 10 48% −6.1±13.0
2ndDeuce courtT 13 58% +1.7±12.4
2ndDeuce courtWide 1 55% +1.5±14.7

Charted matches