RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 1 charted matches · 2022–2022

Brandon Holt

Shot expected value

The share of points Brandon Holt goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 58 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 76% 39.9%±10.1 47.6%
BH through the middle 24% 46.3%±14.1 43.7%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 48 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 63% 45.2%±11.6 48.0%
BH through the middle 27% 35.7%±13.7 43.8%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 46 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH through the middle 28% 58.8%±14.1 47.0%
BH crosscourt 24% 41.4%±14.6 49.1%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 31 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 42% 36.3%±13.8 44.8%
FH through the middle 32% 40.9%±14.8 41.4%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 36% 50% ▲ 74% / 73%
Body 8% 50% ▲ 68% / 63%
T 56% 0% ▼ 71% / 75%

80 normal · 2 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 31% 22% ▼ 76% / 73%
Body 20% 11% ▼ 58% / 63%
T 49% 67% ▲ 76% / 72%

65 normal · 9 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide37% 65.2%±10.1 n=30
Body9% 70.6%±12.3 n=7
T55% 66.8%±8.9 n=45

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.59).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide30% 57.7%±11.3 n=22
Body19% 50.1%±12.4 n=14
T51% 60.3%±9.8 n=38

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.21).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 3 40% +2.7±14.0
1stAd courtT 23 29% +1.0±10.3
1stAd courtWide 14 23% −4.1±10.5
1stDeuce courtBody 5 37% +0.5±13.4
1stDeuce courtT 21 28% +3.4±10.4
1stDeuce courtWide 26 31% +3.5±10.1
2ndAd courtBody 20 48% −1.8±11.6
2ndAd courtT 4 46% −2.9±14.1
2ndAd courtWide 9 47% −0.9±13.2
2ndDeuce courtBody 19 52% +3.4±11.7
2ndDeuce courtT 7 48% −1.3±13.5
2ndDeuce courtWide 1 47% −1.6±14.7

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Brandon Holt's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Not enough data

Return

  1. Not enough data

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 22.6% · won 36% · −3.6±10.2 vs own baseline

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Brandon Holt wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.9% · won 43% · −3.7±12.8 vs own baseline · −11.4 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Pedro Cachin (6/16)
  2. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 3.5% · won 43% · −4.4±12.3 vs own baseline · −11.5 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Pedro Cachin (7/19)

Charted matches