RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2023–2025

Fiona Crawley

Shot expected value

The share of points Fiona Crawley goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 63 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 43% 47.9%±12.0 47.6%
BH through the middle 35% 37.3%±12.3 43.3%
BH down the line 22% 42.2%±13.9 46.8%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 55 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 36% 49.9%±13.0 44.9%
FH through the middle 20% 42.8%±14.6 41.3%
FH slice through the middle 20% 28.5%±13.3 29.2%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 36% 13% ▼ 56% / 66%
Body 25% 25% 59% / 57%
T 39% 63% ▲ 60% / 68%

77 normal · 8 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 27% 38% ▲ 70% / 66%
Body 40% 25% ▼ 57% / 56%
T 33% 38% 62% / 64%

60 normal · 16 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide34% 39.5%±10.5 n=29
Body25% 49.1%±11.5 n=21
T41% 42.8%±10.1 n=35

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.25).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide29% 63.8%±11.0 n=22
Body37% 58.0%±10.7 n=28
T34% 60.1%±10.8 n=26

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.63).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 12 50% +6.5±12.7
1stAd courtT 27 34% −1.0±10.4
1stAd courtWide 25 33% −1.1±10.5
1stDeuce courtBody 14 47% +4.6±12.4
1stDeuce courtT 20 29% −2.9±10.6
1stDeuce courtWide 24 41% +7.1±11.0
2ndAd courtBody 6 60% +4.7±13.4
2ndAd courtT 11 55% −0.1±12.8
2ndAd courtWide 4 56% +2.5±14.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 21 48% −6.7±11.5
2ndDeuce courtT 5 57% +0.6±13.8
2ndDeuce courtWide 10 55% +1.6±12.9

Charted matches