RallyIQ

WTA · Left-handed · 2 charted matches · 2016–2021

Irina Khromacheva

Shot expected value

The share of points Irina Khromacheva goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 63 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 33% 42.7%±12.7 47.6%
BH down the line 27% 46.9%±13.5 46.8%
BH through the middle 24% 39.0%±13.6 43.3%
BH slice through the middle 16% 36.3%±14.4 34.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 39 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 49% 36.8%±12.7 46.7%
FH down the line 36% 44.0%±14.0 44.9%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 35% 33% 67% / 66%
Body 29% 33% 59% / 57%
T 36% 33% 58% / 68%

72 normal · 3 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 40% 57% ▲ 60% / 66%
Body 13% 29% ▲ 53% / 56%
T 47% 14% ▼ 65% / 64%

53 normal · 14 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide35% 48.8%±11.0 n=26
Body29% 49.2%±11.4 n=22
T36% 46.1%±10.9 n=27

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.87).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide43% 49.0%±10.7 n=29
Body16% 47.9%±12.8 n=11
T40% 58.7%±10.7 n=27

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.14).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 32 50% +6.4±10.4
1stAd courtT 10 34% −1.4±12.3
1stAd courtWide 22 31% −3.0±10.6
1stDeuce courtBody 20 46% +3.0±11.6
1stDeuce courtT 11 31% −1.3±11.9
1stDeuce courtWide 38 33% −1.4±9.4
2ndAd courtBody 12 54% −1.4±12.7
2ndAd courtT 7 64% +8.5±13.0
2ndAd courtWide 4 53% −0.4±14.1
2ndDeuce courtBody 15 52% −2.6±12.3
2ndDeuce courtT 1 57% +1.4±14.6
2ndDeuce courtWide 6 53% −0.6±13.7

Charted matches