RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 1998–2001

Jan Michael Gambill

Shot expected value

The share of points Jan Michael Gambill goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 46 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 70% 43.3%±11.3 47.6%
BH through the middle 30% 46.3%±14.1 43.7%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 45 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 49% 38.8%±12.4 46.6%
FH through the middle 27% 47.8%±14.5 41.5%
FH down the line 24% 41.8%±14.6 44.7%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 40 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 45% 45.7%±13.3 46.9%
FH through the middle 38% 32.2%±13.0 41.4%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 45% 25% ▼ 68% / 73%
Body 15% 0% ▼ 61% / 63%
T 40% 75% ▲ 79% / 75%

67 normal · 4 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 42% 29% ▼ 70% / 73%
Body 4% 43% ▲ 64% / 63%
T 55% 29% ▼ 71% / 72%

55 normal · 7 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide44% 60.2%±10.3 n=31
Body14% 56.9%±12.9 n=10
T42% 59.6%±10.4 n=30

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.81).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide40% 53.3%±11.1 n=25
Body8% 51.8%±13.9 n=5
T52% 53.9%±10.4 n=32

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.98).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 6 36% −0.6±13.2
1stAd courtT 13 27% −1.5±11.1
1stAd courtWide 28 28% +0.6±9.7
1stDeuce courtBody 3 36% −0.3±13.8
1stDeuce courtT 17 25% −0.6±10.3
1stDeuce courtWide 31 23% −4.0±8.9
2ndAd courtBody 4 49% +0.1±14.1
2ndAd courtT 3 48% −1.4±14.3
2ndAd courtWide 16 42% −6.0±12.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 6 44% −5.4±13.6
2ndDeuce courtT 4 47% −2.9±14.1
2ndDeuce courtWide 17 52% +3.9±12.0

Charted matches