RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 1988–1998

Natalia Zvereva

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 41% 67% ▲ 59% / 66%
Body 20% 17% 62% / 57%
T 39% 17% ▼ 57% / 68%

82 normal · 6 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 69% 79% ▲ 57% / 66%
Body 8% 5% 57% / 56%
T 23% 16% 63% / 64%

62 normal · 19 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide43% 52.7%±10.0 n=38
Body19% 54.6%±11.9 n=17
T38% 46.9%±10.3 n=33

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.37).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide72% 45.1%±8.7 n=58
Body7% 47.4%±13.7 n=6
T21% 41.0%±11.8 n=17

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.77).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 3 46% +2.1±14.3
1stAd courtT 12 33% −3.0±11.9
1stAd courtWide 21 32% −2.4±10.7
1stDeuce courtBody 6 44% +1.2±13.6
1stDeuce courtT 24 33% +0.5±10.5
1stDeuce courtWide 17 30% −3.8±11.0
2ndAd courtBody 26 58% +3.0±10.8
2ndAd courtT 4 52% −3.5±14.1
2ndAd courtWide 13 47% −6.9±12.5
2ndDeuce courtBody 21 48% −6.7±11.5
2ndDeuce courtT 3 54% −2.1±14.3
2ndDeuce courtWide 17 41% −13.1±11.8

Charted matches