RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 2 charted matches · 2016–2019

Risa Ozaki

Shot expected value

The share of points Risa Ozaki goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 66 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 53% 44.8%±11.0 43.3%
BH crosscourt 23% 44.3%±13.8 47.6%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 55 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH through the middle 36% 40.7%±12.8 41.3%
FH crosscourt 36% 35.9%±12.5 46.7%
FH down the line 27% 45.6%±13.8 44.9%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 41 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 37% 44.1%±13.8 52.2%
FH through the middle 32% 48.9%±14.3 45.8%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 33% 25% 63% / 66%
Body 28% 38% ▲ 54% / 57%
T 39% 38% 66% / 68%

76 normal · 8 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 39% 30% ▼ 57% / 66%
Body 22% 30% ▲ 53% / 56%
T 39% 40% 71% / 64%

64 normal · 10 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide32% 47.9%±10.9 n=27
Body29% 48.2%±11.2 n=24
T39% 46.8%±10.3 n=33

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.97).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide38% 46.5%±10.8 n=28
Body23% 48.2%±12.0 n=17
T39% 62.4%±10.4 n=29

Off equilibrium (p = 0.027): serve T more. Gap 9.3 points per 100 first serves.

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 12 53% +8.9±12.7
1stAd courtT 12 33% −3.0±11.9
1stAd courtWide 16 33% −1.1±11.4
1stDeuce courtBody 11 43% +0.8±12.7
1stDeuce courtT 15 39% +7.1±12.0
1stDeuce courtWide 33 34% −0.4±9.8
2ndAd courtBody 13 55% −0.4±12.5
2ndAd courtT 6 54% −0.8±13.7
2ndAd courtWide 23 53% −0.6±11.3
2ndDeuce courtBody 10 53% −1.1±13.0
2ndDeuce courtT 8 55% −1.3±13.3
2ndDeuce courtWide 10 50% −3.4±13.0

Charted matches