RallyIQ

WTA · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2025–2025

Sahaja Yamalapalli

Shot expected value

The share of points Sahaja Yamalapalli goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 43% to the average player · 68 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 49% 44.1%±11.2 46.7%
FH through the middle 31% 47.0%±12.8 41.3%
FH down the line 21% 47.0%±14.1 44.9%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 50% to the average player · 68 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 21% 51.6%±14.1 52.7%
BH through the middle 19% 43.2%±14.2 46.2%
FH through the middle 18% 44.2%±14.4 45.8%
BH crosscourt 18% 50.6%±14.5 50.9%
FH down the line 16% 53.1%±14.7 52.2%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 45% to the average player · 66 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 48% 49.1%±11.4 47.6%
BH through the middle 38% 37.0%±11.8 43.3%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 35% 50% ▲ 63% / 66%
Body 45% 50% 59% / 57%
T 20% 0% ▼ 62% / 68%

75 normal · 6 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 34% 40% 70% / 66%
Body 47% 10% ▼ 58% / 56%
T 19% 50% ▲ 61% / 64%

62 normal · 10 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. A direction loses 0.19 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage, measured from WTA servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide36% 50.6%±10.7 n=29
Body46% 51.6%±10.0 n=37
T19% 44.5%±12.2 n=15

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.45).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide35% 64.3%±10.6 n=25
Body42% 54.3%±10.6 n=30
T24% 56.5%±11.9 n=17

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.24).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 13 38% −6.3±12.2
1stAd courtT 10 37% +1.1±12.5
1stAd courtWide 19 29% −5.2±10.7
1stDeuce courtBody 17 46% +3.7±12.0
1stDeuce courtT 12 28% −4.4±11.4
1stDeuce courtWide 20 32% −1.6±10.9
2ndAd courtBody 10 56% +1.2±12.9
2ndAd courtT 2 52% −3.4±14.5
2ndAd courtWide 17 51% −2.3±12.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 22 53% −1.9±11.4
2ndDeuce courtT 2 59% +2.7±14.3
2ndDeuce courtWide 7 54% +0.6±13.5

Charted matches