RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2024–2026

Vit Kopriva

Shot expected value

The share of points Vit Kopriva goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 70 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 51% 48.8%±11.0 46.6%
FH through the middle 29% 40.7%±12.8 41.5%
FH down the line 20% 46.9%±14.1 44.7%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 69 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 46% 56.8%±11.3 47.6%
BH through the middle 23% 41.0%±13.5 43.7%
BH down the line 22% 55.1%±13.8 46.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 47 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 21% 51.8%±15.0 52.7%
BH crosscourt 21% 42.8%±14.9 49.1%
FH down the line 21% 51.0%±15.0 51.5%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 47% 50% 65% / 73%
Body 14% 17% 55% / 63%
T 40% 33% 81% / 75%

103 normal · 6 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 45% 53% 75% / 73%
Body 14% 16% 59% / 63%
T 40% 32% ▼ 70% / 72%

84 normal · 19 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide47% 52.1%±9.1 n=51
Body14% 49.2%±12.3 n=15
T39% 49.4%±9.6 n=43

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.86).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide47% 62.5%±9.0 n=48
Body15% 53.8%±12.2 n=15
T39% 51.1%±9.8 n=40

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.13).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 1 39% +2.0±14.4
1stAd courtT 24 27% −1.3±9.9
1stAd courtWide 30 30% +3.1±9.8
1stDeuce courtBody 19 33% −4.0±11.0
1stDeuce courtT 20 21% −4.0±9.5
1stDeuce courtWide 31 20% −7.3±8.4
2ndAd courtBody 12 54% +4.9±12.6
2ndAd courtT 9 38% −11.4±12.8
2ndAd courtWide 18 51% +2.7±11.9
2ndDeuce courtBody 12 47% −2.1±12.7
2ndDeuce courtT 8 50% +0.1±13.3
2ndDeuce courtWide 11 40% −8.0±12.6

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Vit Kopriva's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Not enough data

Return

  1. Not enough data

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 27.0% · won 53% · +1.5±11.8 vs own baseline

Charted matches