Second Opinion on Expensive Technology Decisions

Three proposals for the same project: $80k, $240k and $600k.

Each one prices a different amount of your risk, and nobody who wrote them sits on your side of the table. I read them for owners who carry the decision without a CTO, show you which assumptions moved each number, and tell you which one I would sign with my own money. I sell no development and no software, and I take no vendor commissions or referral fees.

Other decisions owners bring me

“Everyone keeps telling me we need an AI strategy.” Which part of the initiative actually needs AI, what it changes in the business, and what a $20 a month tool would have done.

“My team says we need an app. Do we?” Usually not. When you do, what the smallest version that proves it looks like, and who should build it.

“The project is six months late and I cannot tell what is actually wrong.” Fix it, cut scope, replace the team, or stop. Decided against what runs on your data, not against a status report.

“Our vendor says we need the custom version.” Of course they do. What an off-the-shelf tool would fail at for your business, specifically, and whether the process should change instead.

“We are about to sign for three years.” Data ownership, portability, the API, termination assistance, who holds the credentials. The exit clause, read before the entry.

Everyone you can ask gets paid if the answer is yes

Ask the agency whether you need the build. Yes. Ask the vendor whether you need the platform. Yes. Ask the AI consultancy whether you need an AI initiative. Definitely. Your CTO, if you have one, is often the person who proposed it.

None of them is lying. Each of them was hired to answer “can we”, and you are asking “should we”.

The vendor

Wants you to buy. Knows the product better than anyone in the room and is the least neutral person in it.

The agency

Wants you to build. Its estimate is also its revenue, and nobody prices their own upside conservatively.

The consultancy

Wants a larger engagement. The proposal covers all four parts of the problem because it sells all four.

Me

Paid a fixed fee to find out whether any of them are right. No implementation behind the recommendation, no referral fees, no preferred vendor.

I am on your side of the table. That is the whole product.

Start here: the Second Opinion One decision. $5,000, fixed. Two weeks. A written verdict and a call where I defend it.

See the Second Opinion

You bring one consequential decision: a proposal, a contract, a build, an AI initiative, a platform. I read everything, talk to the people involved, challenge the assumptions, price the alternatives including doing nothing, and tell you what I would do if it were my money. You get it in writing: decision, evidence, options, recommendation, risks, next actions.

What a verdict looks like

Illustrative example. The business and the numbers are invented; the structure is the one you receive.

Decision: A 60-person distributor holds three proposals to replace its order system: $80k, $240k and $600k.
Evidence: The $80k quote assumes customer pricing fits the platform's standard price lists. Eleven of the fourteen customer contracts use tiered rebates it cannot express, so that quote turns into a custom build after signing. The $600k quote includes a warehouse module the business already replaced last year.
Options: Sign the $240k proposal as written. Sign it without the warehouse and reporting phase. Or keep the current system another year and fix the two reports behind most of the complaints.
Recommendation: Sign the $240k proposal without phase three, for $165k, and make data migration a fixed-price milestone. As written it is billed hourly with no ceiling.
Risks: The migration estimate rests on one sample export. If the full export is messier, go-live slips by about eight weeks.
Next actions: Pull the full export this week. Ask for migration as a fixed milestone before the signing date.

CPAs, fractional CFOs and attorneys often see these decisions before anyone else does. Here is how referrals work.

What owners remember

Clarity

“Working with Giacomo gave us clarity and direction we had not found elsewhere. His insights and strategic approach saved us countless hours and dollars.”

CEO · which option was right

Better judgment

“His strategic insights were invaluable when we restructured our app's subscription model. His guidance helped us avoid an expensive misstep.”

COO · an expensive misstep, avoided

Giacomo Balli

The Second Opinion