RallyIQ

US Open · SF · Hard · 9 Sep 1995

Pete Sampras v Jim Courier

140–128 in points · Pete Sampras won

Why it went the way it did

Pete Sampras won 7.7 more points than Jim Courier relative to what the serve alone predicted. Jim Courier's biggest leaks: serve 1st shot selection −2.6, return execution −2.2, backhand execution −1.9.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotPete SamprasJim Courier
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.5 +0.4 +1.7 +2.6 −0.4 −2.6 +0.7 −2.3
Serve 2nd −0.1 −0.8 +1.8 +0.8 −0.1 −1.2 +2.0 +0.7
Return +1.3 −1.5 −1.9 −2.1 +0.6 ±0.0 −2.2 −1.7
Forehand +0.7 +3.4 +1.1 +5.2 +0.4 +5.8 +1.8 +8.0
Backhand +0.4 +1.3 +1.9 +3.7 +0.5 +0.4 −1.9 −1.0
Slice +0.3 −2.4 −0.9 −3.0 ±0.0 −1.8 −1.4 −3.2
Net +1.2 +0.3 −0.4 +1.1 +0.4 +0.1 −0.1 +0.4
Touch −0.1 −0.5 −0.4 −1.0 −0.2 −1.3 +0.3 −1.3
All shots +4.3+0.2 +2.7+7.2 +1.2−0.7 −1.0−0.5

Set by set

SetPete SamprasJim CourierNet, Pete
1−1.8−0.7 −1.1
2−0.1+0.2 −0.3
3+4.0+1.1 +2.9
4+5.1−1.1 +6.1

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Pete Sampras serving

SetWideBodyT
1 49% 78% 3% 100% 49% 61%
2 65% 71% – 35% 67%
3 62% 78% 3% 0% 34% 70%
4 60% 86% – 40% 57%

Set to set +1.13 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.79 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Jim Courier serving

SetWideBodyT
1 45% 92% 7% 100% 48% 57%
2 49% 71% 9% 67% 43% 67%
3 41% 62% 22% 57% 38% 67%
4 49% 62% 21% 56% 30% 54%

Set to set +0.82 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.64 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Pete Sampras

8.5 points left on the table across 419 shots 2.02 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley down the line ×3; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.36 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.26 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle + approach ×1; BH crosscourt + approach rates higher · 0.25 pts

Jim Courier

9.5 points left on the table across 392 shots 2.42 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit FH inside-out ×14; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.39 pts
  2. Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court, server rushing the net hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.39 pts
  3. Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.35 pts
  4. Return +1: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×4; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.33 pts