RallyIQ

Wimbledon · SF · Grass · 5 Jul 2002

David Nalbandian v Xavier Malisse

151–146 in points · David Nalbandian won

Why it went the way it did

David Nalbandian won 9.4 more points than Xavier Malisse relative to what the serve alone predicted. Xavier Malisse's biggest leaks: forehand execution −5.6, slice shot selection −5.2, backhand execution −2.1.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotDavid NalbandianXavier Malisse
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st −0.1 −0.8 −4.0 −4.8 +0.3 −0.9 −0.3 −0.8
Serve 2nd +0.1 −0.7 +1.4 +0.8 −0.3 −0.9 +0.2 −1.0
Return +0.1 −0.2 +3.2 +3.2 +0.1 ±0.0 +1.0 +1.2
Forehand +0.3 +3.6 −3.0 +0.9 +0.2 +3.6 −5.6 −1.8
Backhand +1.0 +1.2 +4.2 +6.4 +0.4 +0.2 −2.1 −1.5
Slice ±0.0 −2.0 −0.2 −2.3 −0.4 −5.2 −0.9 −6.5
Net +0.2 −0.2 −2.2 −2.3 +0.5 +0.6 +1.2 +2.3
Touch −0.1 −1.3 −0.8 −2.2 ±0.0 −0.7 −0.1 −0.7
Other ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.1 −0.4 −0.2 −0.7
All shots +1.5−0.3 −1.4−0.2 +0.7−3.6 −6.6−9.6

Set by set

SetDavid NalbandianXavier MalisseNet, David
1−0.1−2.1 +2.0
2+1.9−5.8 +7.7
3−2.5+1.2 −3.7
4−0.6+2.4 −3.0
5+1.0−5.3 +6.3

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

David Nalbandian serving

SetWideBodyT
1 59% 65% 9% 33% 32% 73%
2 50% 73% 9% 100% 41% 100%
3 60% 42% 10% 50% 30% 50%
4 62% 69% 4% 0% 35% 22%
5 57% 67% 10% 100% 33% 71%

Set to set −0.02 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets +0.44 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Xavier Malisse serving

SetWideBodyT
1 57% 58% – 43% 67%
2 41% 50% 7% 50% 52% 60%
3 50% 57% – 50% 71%
4 56% 72% – 44% 50%
5 52% 33% 4% 0% 43% 60%

Set to set −0.04 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.01 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

David Nalbandian

10.3 points left on the table across 515 shots 2.00 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle + approach ×2; FH down the line + approach rates higher · 0.44 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side, you at net hit BH volley through the middle ×1; BH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.26 pts

Xavier Malisse

13.0 points left on the table across 544 shots 2.38 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×10; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.73 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×11; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.56 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×14; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.54 pts
  4. Return of a 1st serve, wide, deuce court hit FH down the line ×7; FH through the middle rates higher · 0.50 pts