RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 4 charted matches · 1999–2011

Xavier Malisse

Against an average opponent

Serve points won 62.5% ±3.5 raw 56.8% · tour 63.4% · 502 points
Return points won 42.4% ±3.7 raw 39.8% · tour 36.6% · 497 points

Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.

Value per 100 shots

Direction choice +0.28 ±0.19 better than 98% of ATP · raw +0.27
Shot selection −0.34 ±0.20 better than 19% of ATP · raw −0.37
Execution −0.13 ±0.43 better than 61% of ATP · raw −0.60
Points left on the table 2.22 per 100 shots vs best direction · lower than 91% of ATP

Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 2,821 shots.

Shot expected value

The share of points Xavier Malisse goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 221 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 47% 45.6%±7.4 47.6%
BH slice crosscourt 18% 39.8%±10.5 42.5%
BH through the middle 13% 39.1%±11.6 43.7%
BH slice through the middle 8% 40.6%±13.3 35.1%
FH inside-out 7% 42.7%±13.6 51.8%
BH down the line 5% 50.9%±15.0 46.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 145 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH crosscourt 48% 39.2%±8.5 46.6%
FH down the line 31% 44.5%±10.1 44.7%
FH through the middle 21% 38.6%±11.3 41.5%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 107 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH crosscourt 47% 48.0%±9.8 48.0%
BH slice crosscourt 19% 38.6%±12.7 42.1%
BH through the middle 14% 39.3%±13.6 43.8%
BH slice through the middle 9% 26.7%±13.3 35.1%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 80 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 39% 53.5%±11.5 51.5%
FH crosscourt 30% 55.8%±12.3 52.7%
BH through the middle 14% 52.8%±14.7 46.8%

Serve under pressure

Pressure predictability index −14 How much less varied Xavier Malisse's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 56 break-point first serves.

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 57% 50% 64% / 73%
Body 4% 8% 61% / 63%
T 39% 42% 75% / 75%

234 normal · 12 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 48% 36% ▼ 69% / 73%
Body 2% 7% 57% / 63%
T 50% 57% 65% / 72%

188 normal · 44 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints wonOptimal
Wide57% 55.4%±6.3 n=139 48% ▼
Body4% 56.6%±12.9 n=10 0% ▼
T39% 63.4%±7.0 n=97 52% ▲

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.16).
Optimal mix: +0.4 per 100 first serves.

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints wonOptimal
Wide46% 57.3%±7.0 n=107 59% ▲
Body3% 54.5%±13.7 n=6 0% ▼
T51% 52.5%±6.7 n=119 41% ▼

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.34).
Optimal mix: +0.2 per 100 first serves.

Exploitability 0.33 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of ATP servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, ATP mixes picked this way win 0.33 per 100 first serves on average.

Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +5.1±9.6 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (248 repeats, 222 switches.)

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 8 40% +2.7±13.1
1stAd courtT 43 32% +4.0±9.0
1stAd courtWide 94 34% +6.8±7.0
1stDeuce courtBody 17 36% −0.5±11.5
1stDeuce courtT 65 35% +10.2±8.1
1stDeuce courtWide 67 26% −1.2±7.3
2ndAd courtBody 22 50% +0.3±11.4
2ndAd courtT 13 44% −5.6±12.4
2ndAd courtWide 53 49% +0.4±9.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 35 49% −0.2±10.2
2ndDeuce courtT 46 47% −2.5±9.4
2ndDeuce courtWide 18 47% −1.4±11.8

Signature patterns

Recurring sequences that win more than Xavier Malisse's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.

Serve → +1

  1. Wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt used 11.0% · won 60% · −7.7±10.9 vs own baseline
  2. T serve (deuce court) → BH crosscourt used 9.6% · won 57% · −10.1±11.4 vs own baseline

Return

  1. vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, short used 16.4% · won 48% · +3.9±10.8 vs own baseline
  2. vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, mid used 23.6% · won 42% · −1.5±9.3 vs own baseline

Rally, consecutive own shots

  1. FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 8.2% · won 47% · +4.7±10.4 vs own baseline
  2. FH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 5.3% · won 47% · +5.0±11.7 vs own baseline
  3. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 10.1% · won 45% · +2.8±9.8 vs own baseline
  4. FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 7.4% · won 43% · +0.2±10.7 vs own baseline
  5. BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 11.4% · won 38% · −4.5±9.2 vs own baseline

Discovered sequences

Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Xavier Malisse wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.

  1. FH crosscourt → FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 1.0% · won 53% · +8.4±13.0 vs own baseline · +17.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Roger Federer (9/13)
  2. BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.7% · won 48% · +3.5±10.1 vs own baseline · +1.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by David Nalbandian (5/11), Roger Federer (15/29)
  3. BH crosscourt → BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 1.2% · won 44% · ±0.0±12.5 vs own baseline · −8.7 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by David Nalbandian (2/6), Roger Federer (6/12)
  4. FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 2.1% · won 44% · −0.3±10.8 vs own baseline · −3.0 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Roger Federer (10/24), David Nalbandian (4/8)
  5. BH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 1.0% · won 43% · −1.6±12.9 vs own baseline · −4.9 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by David Nalbandian (1/8), Roger Federer (5/7)
  6. FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 1.4% · won 42% · −2.9±12.0 vs own baseline · −10.8 vs tour on the same sequence

Strengths and vulnerabilities

Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.

Hurts opponents most with

BH to their backhand · return+2.5127
BH to their backhand · rally+0.8210
Wide 1st serve · deuce court−1.1139
FH to their forehand · rally−2.6207
FH to their backhand · rally−4.7179

Most exposed to

FH to their backhand · rally−0.6207
BH to their backhand · rally+0.5176
Wide 1st serve · ad court+0.8143
FH to their forehand · rally+2.5197

Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Adrian Andreev, Alex Molcan, Rafael Nadal, Hugo Gaston, Daniel Evans

Charted matches