Wimbledon · QF · Grass · 30 Jun 2009
Dinara Safina v Sabine Lisicki
110–99 in points · Dinara Safina won
Why it went the way it did
Dinara Safina won 5.6 more points than Sabine Lisicki relative to what the serve alone predicted. Sabine Lisicki's biggest leaks: forehand execution −5.3, return execution −2.5, slice shot selection −1.8.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Dinara Safina | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | −0.7 | −0.4 | −1.0 | −2.0 | +0.2 | −0.3 | +1.6 | +1.5 |
| Serve 2nd | −0.1 | ±0.0 | −4.8 | −4.9 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.2 |
| Return | −0.2 | +0.1 | +1.4 | +1.3 | +0.2 | +0.3 | −2.5 | −2.0 |
| Forehand | +0.2 | +1.4 | −0.9 | +0.7 | +0.6 | +1.1 | −5.3 | −3.7 |
| Backhand | +0.6 | −0.2 | +3.9 | +4.4 | +0.7 | +0.4 | −0.5 | +0.5 |
| Slice | ±0.0 | −1.4 | +0.1 | −1.3 | −0.2 | −1.8 | −0.4 | −2.5 |
| Net | ±0.0 | −0.1 | +0.5 | +0.4 | −0.4 | +0.3 | +0.6 | +0.5 |
| Touch | −0.1 | −0.1 | +1.0 | +0.8 | +0.2 | +0.2 | −1.2 | −0.8 |
| All shots | −0.1 | −0.8 | +0.3 | −0.5 | +1.5 | ±0.0 | −7.6 | −6.1 |
Set by set
| Set | Dinara Safina | Sabine Lisicki | Net, Dinara | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −0.2 | −0.9 | +0.7 | |
| 2 | −3.2 | −1.9 | −1.3 | |
| 3 | +2.9 | −3.3 | +6.2 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Dinara Safina serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23% 56% | 20% 75% | 58% 61% |
| 2 | 17% 83% | 37% 54% | 46% 69% |
| 3 | 31% 56% | 38% 55% | 31% 56% |
Set to set +1.26 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +1.18 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Sabine Lisicki serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35% 76% | 21% 50% | 44% 52% |
| 2 | 35% 67% | 12% 67% | 54% 79% |
| 3 | 42% 23% | 6% 50% | 52% 44% |
Set to set −0.02 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.80 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Dinara Safina
6.6 points left on the table across 290 shots 2.29 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.33 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×7; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit BH down the line ×3; BH through the middle rates higher · 0.26 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, wide, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×8; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts
Sabine Lisicki
6.6 points left on the table across 299 shots 2.22 per 100 shots
- Serve +1: slice to your middle, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×2; FH volley down the line rates higher · 0.37 pts
- Serve +1: deep return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×7; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.30 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit BH down the line ×3; BH through the middle rates higher · 0.26 pts