Madrid · R64 · Clay · 29 Apr 2021
Elina Svitolina v Jil Teichmann
111–112 in points · Jil Teichmann won
Why it went the way it did
Elina Svitolina won 1.3 more points than Jil Teichmann relative to what the serve alone predicted. Jil Teichmann's biggest leaks: slice shot selection −3.4, touch shot selection −0.6.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Elina Svitolina | Jil Teichmann | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | +0.5 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.6 | +0.2 | ±0.0 | −0.4 | −0.2 |
| Serve 2nd | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | +1.5 | +1.5 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +0.3 | +0.4 |
| Return | +0.1 | +1.2 | +3.0 | +4.4 | −0.1 | +0.7 | +0.7 | +1.3 |
| Forehand | −0.7 | +2.3 | −1.5 | +0.1 | +0.4 | +6.4 | ±0.0 | +6.7 |
| Backhand | +1.0 | +1.4 | +6.6 | +8.9 | −0.4 | +0.4 | −0.1 | −0.2 |
| Slice | +0.1 | −4.7 | −0.7 | −5.2 | −0.2 | −3.4 | ±0.0 | −3.6 |
| Net | −0.4 | ±0.0 | −0.6 | −1.0 | +0.1 | +0.7 | +1.3 | +2.1 |
| Touch | +0.3 | −1.8 | −0.3 | −1.8 | +0.2 | −0.6 | +0.1 | −0.3 |
| All shots | +0.8 | −1.5 | +8.2 | +7.5 | +0.3 | +4.0 | +1.9 | +6.2 |
Set by set
| Set | Elina Svitolina | Jil Teichmann | Net, Elina | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +2.1 | −2.3 | +4.4 | |
| 2 | +0.9 | +3.8 | −2.9 | |
| 3 | +4.5 | +4.7 | −0.2 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Elina Svitolina serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46% 75% | 12% 67% | 42% 64% |
| 2 | 41% 58% | 3% 0% | 55% 31% |
| 3 | 34% 53% | 14% 50% | 52% 57% |
Set to set −0.84 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.01 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Jil Teichmann serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38% 33% | 21% 40% | 42% 70% |
| 2 | 53% 52% | 18% 43% | 30% 58% |
| 3 | 45% 54% | 16% 56% | 40% 57% |
Set to set +0.86 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.31 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Elina Svitolina
11.3 points left on the table across 487 shots 2.33 per 100 shots
- Return of a 2nd serve, body, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×9; FH down the line rates higher · 0.62 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×8; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.56 pts
- Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH down the line rates higher · 0.49 pts
- Return +1: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH down the line rates higher · 0.39 pts
Jil Teichmann
14.8 points left on the table across 495 shots 2.99 per 100 shots
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit FH through the middle ×8; FH inside-out rates higher · 1.72 pts
- Serve +1: mid-depth return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.59 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.49 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, deuce court hit FH down the line ×2; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.45 pts