RallyIQ

Miami Masters · R32 · Hard · 26 Mar 2023

Casper Ruud v Botic Van De Zandschulp

111–103 in points · Botic Van De Zandschulp won

Why it went the way it did

Casper Ruud won 8.1 more points than Botic Van De Zandschulp relative to what the serve alone predicted. Botic Van De Zandschulp's biggest leaks: forehand execution −4.2, return execution −3.4, slice shot selection −2.9.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotCasper RuudBotic Van De Zandschulp
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st +0.1 −0.1 −1.2 −1.1 −0.4 +0.5 −0.6 −0.5
Serve 2nd ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.5 −0.5 +0.1 −0.1 −0.1 −0.1
Return +0.6 −2.8 −2.4 −4.6 +0.1 −0.3 −3.4 −3.5
Forehand −0.1 +4.9 +3.7 +8.6 −0.6 +2.6 −4.2 −2.1
Backhand −0.1 +1.1 +1.7 +2.7 −0.2 +1.1 +0.9 +1.8
Slice +0.4 −2.6 −0.2 −2.3 +0.3 −2.9 +1.3 −1.3
Net −0.2 +1.4 −4.6 −3.4 ±0.0 −0.2 +0.3 +0.1
Touch −0.1 −1.1 +1.0 −0.2 −0.1 −2.4 −0.8 −3.3
Other ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 ±0.0 −0.1 −0.2 +0.1 −0.2
All shots +0.8+0.8 −2.5−0.9 −0.8−1.8 −6.5−9.1

Set by set

SetCasper RuudBotic Van De ZandschulpNet, Casper
1+3.5−4.9 +8.4
2−1.9+1.3 −3.2
3−2.5−5.5 +3.0

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

Casper Ruud serving

SetWideBodyT
1 67% 88% 8% 100% 25% 67%
2 38% 57% 5% 100% 57% 67%
3 59% 68% 6% 0% 34% 55%

Set to set +0.44 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.98 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Botic Van De Zandschulp serving

SetWideBodyT
1 35% 64% 20% 25% 45% 61%
2 45% 69% 7% 0% 48% 93%
3 40% 57% 19% 60% 40% 52%

Set to set +0.70 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −0.05 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

Casper Ruud

10.3 points left on the table across 424 shots 2.44 per 100 shots

  1. Return of a 2nd serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×6; FH inside-out rates higher · 0.55 pts
  2. Long rally, 9+: lob to your backhand side, you at net hit Smash through the middle ×2; Smash inside-in rates higher · 0.35 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×8; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.31 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, opponent at net hit FH through the middle ×2; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.27 pts

Botic Van De Zandschulp

10.1 points left on the table across 411 shots 2.45 per 100 shots

  1. Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×11; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.46 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×8; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.41 pts
  3. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side, you at net hit FH volley through the middle ×1; FH volley crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts