RallyIQ

Australian Open · Q1 · Hard · 10 Jan 2024

John Millman v Alessandro Giannessi

62–53 in points · John Millman won

Why it went the way it did

John Millman won 1.6 more points than Alessandro Giannessi relative to what the serve alone predicted. Alessandro Giannessi's biggest leaks: serve 2nd execution −3.1, slice shot selection −3.0, touch shot selection −1.7.

Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.

ShotJohn MillmanAlessandro Giannessi
DirSelExecTotalDirSelExecTotal
Serve 1st −0.1 −0.1 −1.6 −1.9 −0.3 +0.1 −1.1 −1.3
Serve 2nd ±0.0 ±0.0 +0.4 +0.4 ±0.0 ±0.0 −3.1 −3.1
Return −0.1 +0.3 −2.6 −2.5 ±0.0 −1.3 −1.6 −3.0
Forehand +0.5 +1.5 −3.1 −1.2 −0.1 +2.8 +0.1 +2.8
Backhand +0.2 −0.3 +0.4 +0.2 −0.6 +0.3 +0.5 +0.2
Slice −0.2 −0.4 −0.3 −1.0 −0.4 −3.0 −0.3 −3.7
Net −0.1 +0.3 −1.3 −1.1 +0.2 +0.1 −0.9 −0.6
Touch −0.2 −0.9 −0.1 −1.2 +0.1 −1.7 +0.5 −1.1
All shots ±0.0+0.3 −8.5−8.2 −1.1−2.8 −5.9−9.8

Set by set

SetJohn MillmanAlessandro GiannessiNet, John
1−4.5−6.3 +1.8
2−3.7−3.5 −0.2

Adaptation

First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.

John Millman serving

SetWideBodyT
1 37% 73% 13% 100% 50% 60%
2 46% 56% 14% 40% 40% 71%

Set to set +1.53 per 100 first serves in sets 2+

Within sets −1.24 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Alessandro Giannessi serving

SetWideBodyT
1 45% 80% 23% 80% 32% 29%
2 56% 60% 19% 60% 26% 57%

Within sets −1.88 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games

Counterfactual: the best direction every time

If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.

John Millman

5.0 points left on the table across 247 shots 2.04 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×5; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.28 pts
  2. Rally, shots 5–8: lob to your backhand side, you at net hit BH smash through the middle ×1; BH smash crosscourt rates higher · 0.22 pts
  3. Long rally, 9+: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×4; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.21 pts
  4. Serve +1: short return to your middle hit FH through the middle ×2; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.20 pts

Alessandro Giannessi

9.5 points left on the table across 258 shots 3.70 per 100 shots

  1. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH slice through the middle ×7; BH slice crosscourt rates higher · 0.51 pts
  2. Return of a 1st serve, wide, deuce court hit BH slice through the middle ×6; BH slice inside-in rates higher · 0.47 pts
  3. Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit BH slice through the middle ×4; BH slice inside-in rates higher · 0.39 pts
  4. Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×10; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.39 pts