RallyIQ

ATP · Left-handed · 2 charted matches · 2018–2024

Alessandro Giannessi

Shot expected value

The share of points Alessandro Giannessi goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 111 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 21% 45.9%±12.5 43.7%
FH through the middle 15% 54.2%±13.5 45.2%
BH down the line 15% 46.7%±13.5 46.4%
FH inside-in 15% 53.9%±13.5 54.7%
BH slice through the middle 13% 32.4%±13.2 35.1%
FH inside-out 9% 47.9%±15.0 51.8%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 63 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 21% 26.6%±12.6 43.8%
FH inside-in 16% 56.2%±14.9 54.3%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 48 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 38% 45.5%±13.3 51.5%
FH crosscourt 29% 54.5%±14.0 52.7%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 27% 60% ▲ 75% / 73%
Body 25% 0% ▼ 66% / 63%
T 48% 40% ▼ 65% / 75%

81 normal · 5 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 65% 70% 70% / 73%
Body 9% 30% ▲ 65% / 63%
T 26% 0% ▼ 71% / 72%

66 normal · 10 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide29% 65.6%±10.5 n=25
Body23% 61.8%±11.3 n=20
T48% 55.6%±9.7 n=41

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.26).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide66% 64.8%±8.8 n=50
Body12% 60.1%±12.9 n=9
T22% 58.3%±11.8 n=17

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.24).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 7 33% −4.3±12.7
1stAd courtT 34 26% −2.4±9.0
1stAd courtWide 9 31% +4.0±12.2
1stDeuce courtBody 7 41% +3.9±13.3
1stDeuce courtT 15 23% −1.7±10.4
1stDeuce courtWide 38 30% +2.5±9.1
2ndAd courtBody 11 48% −1.1±12.8
2ndAd courtT 18 56% +6.5±11.8
2ndAd courtWide 5 41% −6.9±13.7
2ndDeuce courtBody 3 51% +1.6±14.3
2ndDeuce courtT 2 50% ±0.0±14.5
2ndDeuce courtWide 25 53% +5.4±11.1

Strengths and vulnerabilities

Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.

Hurts opponents most with

FH to their backhand · rally+3.2123

Most exposed to

FH to their backhand · rally−2.2141

Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Adrian Andreev, Alex Molcan, Rafael Nadal, Hugo Gaston, Daniel Evans

Charted matches