Barcelona · R64 · Clay · 15 Apr 2024
Martin Landaluce v Nick Hardt
82–87 in points · Nick Hardt won
Why it went the way it did
Nick Hardt won 3.3 more points than Martin Landaluce relative to what the serve alone predicted. Martin Landaluce's biggest leaks: serve 1st execution −2.9, forehand execution −2.8, slice shot selection −2.3.
Each shot moves its hitter's chance of winning the point. Those moves are split into direction choice, shot selection and execution, and summed here. Read both columns together: one player's gain is the other's loss.
| Shot | Martin Landaluce | Nick Hardt | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | Dir | Sel | Exec | Total | |
| Serve 1st | −0.1 | +0.1 | −2.9 | −2.9 | −0.4 | −0.2 | ±0.0 | −0.7 |
| Serve 2nd | +0.1 | ±0.0 | −0.9 | −0.9 | ±0.0 | ±0.0 | −2.2 | −2.2 |
| Return | +0.5 | ±0.0 | +0.8 | +1.4 | +0.1 | ±0.0 | +3.4 | +3.5 |
| Forehand | −0.9 | +3.3 | −2.8 | −0.4 | −0.3 | +4.5 | −1.3 | +2.9 |
| Backhand | +0.3 | −0.8 | +1.5 | +0.9 | −0.2 | −0.7 | −0.2 | −1.1 |
| Slice | +0.1 | −2.3 | +0.9 | −1.3 | +0.7 | −2.0 | +0.3 | −1.0 |
| Net | +0.2 | +0.1 | +1.7 | +2.1 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | −1.8 | −1.7 |
| Touch | ±0.0 | −0.4 | −1.8 | −2.2 | ±0.0 | +0.1 | +0.1 | +0.2 |
| All shots | +0.2 | −0.1 | −3.5 | −3.4 | −0.1 | +1.8 | −1.7 | −0.1 |
Set by set
| Set | Martin Landaluce | Nick Hardt | Net, Martin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +1.4 | −2.1 | +3.5 | |
| 2 | +1.0 | +2.2 | −1.3 | |
| 3 | −5.8 | −0.2 | −5.6 |
Adaptation
First-serve direction mix set by set, with the share of points each direction won. The scores measure whether the server moved toward the directions that had been winning earlier in this match, set to set and every two to three service games, in points per 100 first serves. Read them as a habit, not a gain: across the tour, a direction's edge in early sets barely predicts the later ones. Whether the returner responded can't be told apart from noise within one match.
Martin Landaluce serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52% 63% | 19% 83% | 29% 33% |
| 2 | 55% 56% | 17% 60% | 28% 75% |
| 3 | 50% 57% | 11% 33% | 39% 64% |
Set to set +0.71 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets −0.16 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Nick Hardt serving
| Set | Wide | Body | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44% 58% | 22% 0% | 33% 56% |
| 2 | 54% 68% | 29% 50% | 17% 83% |
| 3 | 42% 63% | 26% 100% | 32% 100% |
Set to set −0.02 per 100 first serves in sets 2+
Within sets +0.52 per 100 first serves, every two to three service games
Counterfactual: the best direction every time
If each shot had gone in the direction that is usually worth most for that stroke and position, this is how many more points each player would expect to win. It's an upper bound: the best direction isn't always on, and the chart can't see the ball's pace or position.
Martin Landaluce
8.3 points left on the table across 375 shots 2.21 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×12; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.46 pts
- Return +1: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.41 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×7; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.36 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×2; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.33 pts
Nick Hardt
7.9 points left on the table across 361 shots 2.17 per 100 shots
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side hit FH through the middle ×10; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.51 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side hit BH through the middle ×12; BH crosscourt rates higher · 0.46 pts
- Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle hit FH through the middle ×6; FH crosscourt rates higher · 0.34 pts
- Return of a 1st serve, T, ad court hit FH through the middle ×2; FH inside-in rates higher · 0.33 pts