RallyIQ

ATP · Right-handed · 3 charted matches · 2022–2024

Nick Hardt

Shot expected value

The share of points Nick Hardt goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 126 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 36% 48.8%±10.2 43.7%
BH crosscourt 28% 44.6%±11.0 47.6%
BH slice crosscourt 10% 40.9%±14.1 42.5%
FH inside-out 9% 43.1%±14.6 51.8%
BH down the line 8% 54.3%±15.0 46.4%

Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle

position worth 51% to the average player · 60 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
FH down the line 35% 54.4%±12.8 51.5%
FH through the middle 22% 49.7%±14.3 47.0%
FH crosscourt 22% 56.2%±14.2 52.7%
BH through the middle 22% 43.5%±14.2 46.8%

Return +1: drive to your backhand side

position worth 44% to the average player · 54 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 31% 53.0%±13.5 43.0%
BH slice crosscourt 19% 53.9%±15.0 40.9%
BH crosscourt 19% 48.0%±15.0 46.9%

Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side

position worth 46% to the average player · 49 shots

OptionUsedWin %Tour
BH through the middle 29% 31.7%±13.1 43.8%
BH crosscourt 29% 45.9%±14.1 48.0%
BH slice crosscourt 24% 60.7%±14.2 42.1%

Serve under pressure

Deuce court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 46% 50% 70% / 73%
Body 19% 0% ▼ 60% / 63%
T 34% 50% ▲ 66% / 75%

99 normal · 4 break-point 1st serves

Ad court

1st serveUsageBreak ptWon when in
Wide 66% 80% ▲ 67% / 73%
Body 14% 7% 63% / 63%
T 20% 13% 72% / 72%

79 normal · 15 break-point 1st serves

Is the serve mix in equilibrium?

Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.

Deuce court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide47% 62.3%±9.0 n=48
Body18% 57.3%±11.6 n=19
T35% 57.1%±10.0 n=36

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.63).

Ad court

1st serveUsagePoints won
Wide68% 62.9%±8.2 n=64
Body13% 60.1%±12.4 n=12
T19% 60.8%±11.6 n=18

Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.85).

Return by serve direction

Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.

ServeCourtDirectionPointsWonvs tour
1stAd courtBody 10 40% +3.3±12.8
1stAd courtT 12 30% +1.5±11.6
1stAd courtWide 53 33% +5.5±8.5
1stDeuce courtBody 9 41% +4.3±13.0
1stDeuce courtT 36 42% +16.6±10.0
1stDeuce courtWide 28 35% +7.6±10.3
2ndAd courtBody 6 55% +5.7±13.6
2ndAd courtT 4 52% +3.0±14.1
2ndAd courtWide 26 53% +4.3±11.0
2ndDeuce courtBody 12 54% +5.0±12.6
2ndDeuce courtT 23 56% +6.7±11.2
2ndDeuce courtWide 11 50% +1.7±12.8

Strengths and vulnerabilities

Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.

Hurts opponents most with

Most exposed to

FH to their backhand · rally+2.1129

Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Adrian Andreev, Alex Molcan, Rafael Nadal, Hugo Gaston, Daniel Evans

Charted matches