Game plan

Alize Cornet v Viktorija Golubic

Every number combines what Alize Cornet does well with what Viktorija Golubic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alize Cornet wins, best of 3 52%90%: 29%–75% · best of 5: 53%

Serve points won 53.9% / 53.4% Alize / Viktorija · tour 56.4%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 49%serve 53.9% / 54.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Alize Cornet's record against Viktorija Golubic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.4 on serve, +16.3 on return vs expectation (116 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Alize	Viktorija
Direction choice	−0.29 ±0.10 better than 9%	−0.29 ±0.09 better than 8%
Shot selection	−0.28 ±0.15 better than 22%	−0.97 ±0.19 better than 3%
Execution	+0.52 ±0.47 better than 79%	+0.87 ±0.49 better than 88%
Points left on the table	2.79 ±0.13 lower than 24%	2.93 ±0.14 lower than 14%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alize Cornet +0.99, Viktorija Golubic +1.32. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alize Cornet serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Alize wins	v Viktorija	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	44%	62%	65%	61.6%±7.6	59% ▲
Body	28%	57%	57%	56.7%±8.2	13% ▼
T	28%	64%	62%	57.2%±8.5	28%

Optimal v Viktorija Golubic: +0.5±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Alize wins	v Viktorija	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	31%	67%	73%	74.8%±6.8	46% ▲
Body	36%	60%	55%	59.0%±8.9	21% ▼
T	33%	58%	67%	60.9%±7.9	33%

Optimal v Viktorija Golubic: +1.0±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +10.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Viktorija Golubic serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Viktorija wins	v Alize	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	36%	54%	64%	51.3%±7.7	21% ▼
Body	34%	65%	55%	62.6%±7.5	49% ▲
T	30%	55%	65%	52.3%±9.0	30%

Optimal v Alize Cornet: +0.5±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +7.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Viktorija wins	v Alize	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	35%	57%	61%	52.5%±8.2	39% ▲
Body	30%	54%	58%	55.8%±8.5	15% ▼
T	35%	60%	61%	56.6%±8.0	46% ▲

Optimal v Alize Cornet: +0.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alize Cornet returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Viktorija	Value
FH through the middle	36%	+4.2	+2.4	+1.0	+7.6±2.6
FH down the line	24%	+1.5	+1.8	+1.8	+5.2±4.5
FH slice through the middle	19%	−6.7	+0.8	−1.0	−6.8±2.3
FH slice crosscourt	9%	−6.6	+1.8	−0.1	−4.9±2.4
FH crosscourt	8%	+5.3	+2.1	−2.4	+5.0±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +5.1±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (473 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Viktorija	Value
BH through the middle	48%	+6.0	+0.1	+1.9	+8.0±2.4
BH crosscourt	24%	+7.7	+0.5	+1.5	+9.7±3.4
BH down the line	14%	+2.2	+2.9	+6.0	+11.1±4.6
BH slice through the middle	7%	−6.2	−1.2	−0.9	−8.4±2.0
BH slice down the line	3%	−12.5	+0.4	±0.0	−12.1±2.0

Lean BH down the line: +4.3±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (385 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Viktorija	Value
FH through the middle	47%	−3.2	+2.6	+2.5	+1.9±3.1
FH down the line	36%	−0.6	+3.0	+5.4	+7.8±5.2
FH crosscourt	10%	+0.5	±0.0	−2.0	−1.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle	8%	−15.2	+1.0	±0.0	−14.2±1.2

Lean FH down the line: +5.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (90 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Viktorija	Value
BH through the middle	45%	−2.6	+1.0	+0.1	−1.5±2.7
BH crosscourt	31%	+1.5	−0.8	−0.7	+0.1±3.7
BH down the line	13%	−0.5	+2.7	+0.5	+2.7±5.1
FH through the middle	8%	−2.7	+0.9	+2.5	+0.7±2.4
FH inside-out	3%	+1.4	+0.3	+5.4	+7.1±3.5

Lean BH down the line: +2.7±4.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (177 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Viktorija Golubic returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alize	Value
FH through the middle	53%	+4.2	+2.0	+1.1	+7.3±2.5
FH crosscourt	16%	+5.3	−1.5	+2.1	+6.0±4.1
FH down the line	15%	+1.5	−0.3	+0.1	+1.4±4.6
FH slice through the middle	9%	−6.7	+0.9	+0.4	−5.4±2.5
FH slice crosscourt	5%	−6.6	−0.6	+1.4	−5.8±2.5

Lean FH through the middle: +3.3±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (280 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alize	Value
BH through the middle	32%	+6.0	+0.1	+1.8	+8.0±2.5
BH slice through the middle	31%	−6.2	+2.1	−0.7	−4.8±2.5
BH crosscourt	15%	+7.7	+0.7	+1.6	+10.0±3.5
BH slice crosscourt	10%	−4.2	+0.9	+0.2	−3.1±2.8
BH down the line	8%	+2.2	−1.9	−0.4	−0.1±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.1±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (267 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alize	Value
FH through the middle	67%	−3.2	+2.4	±0.0	−0.8±2.9
FH crosscourt	33%	+0.5	−0.4	+3.3	+3.4±4.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (48 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alize	Value
BH through the middle	56%	−2.6	+2.0	−0.9	−1.5±2.6
BH crosscourt	25%	+1.5	+1.6	+2.0	+5.1±3.5
BH down the line	19%	−0.5	−1.8	+0.7	−1.6±5.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (135 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Alize Cornet

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH to their forehand · return	+9.0±5.6	+2.7	+6.3
FH to their backhand · return	+7.4±5.2	+1.6	+5.8
BH to their forehand · rally	+7.2±4.6	+5.5	+1.7
FH to the middle · return	+5.6±2.6	+2.6	+3.0
BH to their forehand · return +1	+5.0±6.9	+5.1	±0.0
BH to their forehand · serve +1	+3.0±6.8	+4.0	−1.0

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · return +1	−4.9±5.4	−1.3	−3.6
BH to their backhand · return +1	−3.8±4.0	−0.8	−3.0
FH to their forehand · return	−2.1±5.9	+0.5	−2.5
FH to their forehand · rally	−1.9±2.8	+0.2	−2.1
FH to the middle · serve +1	−0.2±3.2	+0.8	−1.1

Viktorija Golubic

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH slice to their backhand · rally	+7.5±5.3	+2.0	+5.5
FH to their backhand · rally	+5.9±3.3	+2.7	+3.1
BH slice to their backhand · rally	+3.4±3.6	+2.7	+0.7
FH to the middle · return	+3.4±2.6	+2.7	+0.7
FH to the middle · serve +1	+3.3±3.1	+2.2	+1.1
FH to their forehand · return	+3.2±5.7	−1.0	+4.2

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−3.1±4.8	−1.1	−2.0
BH to their forehand · return	−2.4±6.1	−3.1	+0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1	−1.9±5.8	−1.1	−0.8
FH to their forehand · return +1	−1.7±5.2	−0.4	−1.3
BH to their forehand · rally	−1.1±4.6	±0.0	−1.1

Against Viktorija Golubic-like opponents

Alize Cornet v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	53.2%	44.2%
Players most similar to Viktorija Golubic	1	53.3%	59.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jessica Pegula, Marie Bouzkova, Emma Navarro, Emma Raducanu, Ajla Tomljanovic, Lin Zhu, Zarina Diyas, Kateryna Baindl, R. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.