Game plan

Daniel Evans v Lukas Lacko

Every number combines what Daniel Evans does well with what Lukas Lacko allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Daniel Evans wins, best of 3 93%90%: 65%–99% · best of 5: 96%

Serve points won 69.7% / 58.1% Daniel / Lukas · tour 65.7%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 93%serve 69.7% / 58.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Daniel Evans's record against Lukas Lacko's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Daniel	Lukas
Direction choice	−0.03 ±0.17 better than 48%	−0.05 ±0.12 better than 44%
Shot selection	−1.18 ±0.22 better than 1%	−0.25 ±0.29 better than 27%
Execution	+0.37 ±0.40 better than 81%	−0.04 ±1.05 better than 66%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Daniel Evans serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Daniel wins	v Lukas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	31%	74%	77%	78.3%±7.5	44% ▲
Body	12%	62%	59%	58.1%±14.4	0% ▼
T	57%	73%	73%	71.4%±9.2	56%

Optimal v Lukas Lacko: +1.0±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Daniel wins	v Lukas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	56%	73%	76%	76.1%±8.5	53% ▼
Body	9%	57%	53%	46.5%±14.5	0% ▼
T	34%	67%	80%	76.3%±8.8	47% ▲

Optimal v Lukas Lacko: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Lukas Lacko serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Lukas wins	v Daniel	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	43%	74%	71%	72.3%±8.5	56% ▲
Body	5%	63%	63%	63.1%±14.7	0% ▼
T	52%	71%	73%	69.4%±8.6	44% ▼

Optimal v Daniel Evans: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Lukas wins	v Daniel	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	56%	67%	70%	64.3%±8.9	43% ▼
Body	10%	62%	66%	65.3%±13.8	10%
T	34%	70%	65%	63.3%±11.0	47% ▲

Optimal v Daniel Evans: +0.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Daniel Evans returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lukas	Value
FH through the middle	41%	+4.3	+1.7	+1.5	+7.5±2.8
FH down the line	24%	+1.7	+1.8	−1.0	+2.5±4.2
FH slice through the middle	14%	−4.2	+0.2	−0.3	−4.3±2.0
FH crosscourt	13%	+5.5	−1.0	+0.2	+4.7±4.2
FH slice down the line	6%	−4.3	+1.8	±0.0	−2.5±2.2

Lean FH through the middle: +4.0±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (455 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lukas	Value
BH slice through the middle	43%	−4.2	+0.5	+3.3	−0.3±2.2
BH slice crosscourt	27%	+0.5	+1.6	+2.6	+4.7±2.7
BH through the middle	12%	+6.4	+0.9	+1.8	+9.1±2.8
BH slice down the line	7%	−8.4	+0.3	−0.2	−8.2±2.9
BH crosscourt	6%	+8.8	−0.6	±0.0	+8.2±3.4

Lean BH through the middle: +6.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (580 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lukas	Value
FH through the middle	51%	−3.5	−0.4	−2.0	−5.8±2.9
FH down the line	32%	−1.8	+0.9	+0.2	−0.7±3.9
FH crosscourt	17%	−0.2	+3.4	+0.5	+3.6±3.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.2±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (103 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Lukas	Value
BH slice crosscourt	35%	−4.0	−2.1	−0.7	−6.8±2.1
BH slice through the middle	25%	−11.3	−1.2	+0.5	−12.0±2.0
BH through the middle	10%	−2.9	+0.5	+0.7	−1.6±2.5
FH through the middle	9%	−2.9	−0.5	−2.0	−5.4±2.4
FH inside-out	8%	+1.0	+1.1	+0.2	+2.2±3.1
BH crosscourt	4%	+1.0	+0.4	+1.8	+3.2±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (442 returns charted)

Lukas Lacko returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Daniel	Value
FH through the middle	44%	+4.3	+0.4	+0.9	+5.6±2.7
FH crosscourt	29%	+5.5	−2.2	±0.0	+3.3±4.2
FH down the line	27%	+1.7	−2.9	+5.9	+4.7±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +0.9±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (82 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Daniel	Value
BH through the middle	44%	+6.4	−2.0	+1.5	+6.0±2.4
BH crosscourt	31%	+8.8	+0.6	+1.0	+10.4±3.1
BH slice through the middle	17%	−4.2	−0.4	+0.1	−4.5±2.2
BH slice crosscourt	7%	+0.5	+0.7	−2.1	−0.8±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (70 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Daniel	Value
BH crosscourt	65%	+1.0	−0.9	+1.0	+1.2±3.0
BH through the middle	35%	−2.9	+1.7	+0.5	−0.7±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.7±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (51 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Daniel Evans

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · rally	+6.9±4.9	+4.2	+2.7
FH to their forehand · rally	+4.8±5.1	+1.3	+3.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally	+3.3±2.7	+2.2	+1.1
FH to the middle · rally	+0.8±3.0	+1.4	−0.6
BH to the middle · rally	+0.6±2.3	−0.3	+0.9
BH to their backhand · rally	+0.5±4.0	−1.5	+2.1

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to the middle · return	−1.4±3.3	−0.6	−0.8
BH to their backhand · rally	+0.5±4.0	−1.5	+2.1
BH to the middle · rally	+0.6±2.3	−0.3	+0.9
FH to the middle · rally	+0.8±3.0	+1.4	−0.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally	+3.3±2.7	+2.2	+1.1

Lukas Lacko

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH to their backhand · return	+1.9±4.8	+0.8	+1.1
BH to the middle · return	+0.4±3.1	−0.3	+0.7
BH to their backhand · rally	−0.6±3.0	+0.7	−1.3
BH to the middle · rally	−1.5±2.6	+0.7	−2.3
FH to their forehand · rally	−2.5±4.1	−0.7	−1.8
FH to the middle · rally	−2.8±2.9	−2.0	−0.9

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · rally	−8.3±5.0	−3.0	−5.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−6.9±5.3	−3.1	−3.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1	−4.7±5.4	−3.9	−0.9
FH to the middle · rally	−2.8±2.9	−2.0	−0.9
FH to their forehand · rally	−2.5±4.1	−0.7	−1.8

Against Lukas Lacko-like opponents

Daniel Evans v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	62.1%	37.6%