RallyIQ

Game plan

Katie Volynets v Dalma Galfi

Every number combines what Katie Volynets does well with what Dalma Galfi allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Katie Volynets wins, best of 3 73%90%: 40%–93% · best of 5: 78%
Serve points won 58.5% / 53.9% Katie / Dalma · tour 56.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 73%serve 58.5% / 53.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Katie Volynets's record against Dalma Galfi's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKatieDalma
Direction choice−0.17 ±0.13
better than 23%
−0.08 ±0.19
better than 39%
Shot selection±0.00 ±0.15
better than 45%
−0.20 ±0.15
better than 28%
Execution+1.57 ±0.45
better than 97%
−1.35 ±1.00
better than 12%
Points left on the table2.59 ±0.19
lower than 53%
2.69 ±0.15
lower than 35%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Katie Volynets serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKatie winsv DalmaMatchupOptimal
Wide47%64%66%64.9%±8.562% ▲
Body29%52%53%47.8%±9.813% ▼
T24%58%68%59.0%±13.125%

Optimal v Dalma Galfi: +1.4±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKatie winsv DalmaMatchupOptimal
Wide28%68%63%65.8%±10.543% ▲
Body22%54%62%59.9%±11.17% ▼
T50%59%69%63.6%±9.450%

Optimal v Dalma Galfi: +0.6±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Dalma Galfi serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDalma winsv KatieMatchupOptimal
Wide44%64%66%63.8%±8.556% ▲
Body30%62%57%61.9%±10.132% ▲
T27%57%63%51.7%±11.112% ▼

Optimal v Katie Volynets: +0.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDalma winsv KatieMatchupOptimal
Wide31%68%62%64.6%±10.231%
Body30%48%52%43.2%±11.015% ▼
T39%65%64%65.3%±9.254% ▲

Optimal v Katie Volynets: +1.1±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Katie Volynets returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DalmaValue
FH through the middle49%+4.2+1.6+2.4+8.2±2.9
FH crosscourt32%+5.3+1.3−0.9+5.7±4.1
FH down the line11%+1.5−2.2−1.6−2.3±4.7
FH slice through the middle5%−6.7−0.3+1.0−6.0±2.4
FH slice crosscourt2%−6.6±0.0+1.4−5.2±2.2

Lean FH through the middle: +3.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (372 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DalmaValue
BH through the middle49%+6.0+1.5−1.1+6.4±2.6
BH crosscourt25%+7.7+4.0+0.7+12.5±3.6
BH down the line12%+2.2+1.4−1.3+2.2±4.4
BH slice through the middle8%−6.2±0.0+0.9−5.3±2.1
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.2+0.5−0.9−4.6±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (294 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DalmaValue
FH through the middle54%−3.2+2.6+0.7+0.1±3.0
FH crosscourt35%+0.5+1.2+1.1+2.8±3.6
FH down the line11%−0.6−2.5−1.1−4.1±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (83 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DalmaValue
BH through the middle48%−2.6+1.4−1.3−2.5±2.8
BH crosscourt32%+1.5+3.5−4.3+0.7±3.7
BH down the line20%−0.5−0.3−1.7−2.5±4.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (125 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Dalma Galfi returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KatieValue
FH through the middle51%+4.2−5.0+1.9+1.1±2.7
FH down the line19%+1.5+3.9+1.9+7.3±4.4
FH slice crosscourt12%−6.6−1.2−0.2−8.0±2.3
FH crosscourt10%+5.3+0.1+3.9+9.4±3.6
FH slice through the middle9%−6.7−1.1−0.5−8.3±2.3

Lean FH down the line: +6.2±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (134 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KatieValue
BH through the middle47%+6.0+3.1+1.6+10.8±2.6
BH crosscourt22%+7.7−0.9+2.6+9.4±3.2
BH down the line21%+2.2−0.3+1.3+3.1±4.3
BH slice through the middle10%−6.2−0.5+0.7−6.1±1.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (68 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KatieValue
BH through the middle51%−2.6+0.1+0.5−2.0±2.8
BH crosscourt27%+1.5±0.0+1.0+2.4±3.4
BH down the line22%−0.5−0.7+2.3+1.1±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.6±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (55 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Katie Volynets

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+7.5±5.0+1.0+6.6
FH to the middle · return+6.6±3.6+2.9+3.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.5±5.6+1.8+1.7
BH to the middle · rally+3.1±2.8+2.9+0.1
FH to their forehand · rally+2.2±4.2+3.1−0.9
BH to their backhand · return+1.0±5.0+5.4−4.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.1±5.8+0.9−6.0
BH to their backhand · rally−2.7±3.7+3.2−5.9
BH to the middle · serve +1−1.8±3.5+0.7−2.5
BH to the middle · return−0.3±2.8+1.7−2.0
BH to their backhand · return+1.0±5.0+5.4−4.3

Dalma Galfi

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally+3.8±4.1+3.5+0.3
BH to the middle · return+3.2±3.4+0.6+2.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.9±5.4+0.3+1.6
BH to the middle · rally+1.5±3.0−0.5+2.0
BH to their backhand · return±0.0±4.9−4.1+4.1
FH to their backhand · rally−1.7±4.4−0.7−1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−5.3±7.0−5.8+0.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.5±5.1−2.2−2.3
FH to their forehand · rally−3.6±4.4−3.2−0.4
FH to the middle · return−2.6±3.3−5.9+3.4
BH to their forehand · rally−2.5±5.9−1.9−0.5

Against Dalma Galfi-like opponents

Katie Volynets vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.8%44.0%