RallyIQ

Game plan

Katie Volynets v Veronika Erjavec

Every number combines what Katie Volynets does well with what Veronika Erjavec allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Katie Volynets serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKatie winsv VeronikaMatchupOptimal
Wide47%64%74%72.4%±10.562% ▲
Body29%52%54%48.1%±13.513% ▼
T24%58%70%61.1%±12.525%

Optimal v Veronika Erjavec: +1.5±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +9.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKatie winsv VeronikaMatchupOptimal
Wide28%68%70%72.5%±10.743% ▲
Body22%54%51%48.6%±15.07% ▼
T50%59%71%65.8%±11.950%

Optimal v Veronika Erjavec: +0.9±1.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +8.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Veronika Erjavec serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowVeronika winsv KatieMatchupOptimal
Wide44%65%66%64.7%±11.559% ▲
Body14%58%57%58.0%±14.50% ▼
T42%60%63%54.6%±12.841% ▼

Optimal v Katie Volynets: +0.3±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowVeronika winsv KatieMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%62%67.0%±12.151% ▲
Body18%53%52%48.4%±14.43% ▼
T40%67%64%66.5%±11.946% ▲

Optimal v Katie Volynets: +0.7±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Katie Volynets returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
FH through the middle49%+4.2+1.6+2.4+8.2±2.8
FH crosscourt32%+5.3+1.3±0.0+6.6±3.7
FH down the line11%+1.5−2.2+0.3−0.4±4.1
FH slice through the middle5%−6.7−0.3−1.5−8.5±1.9
FH slice crosscourt2%−6.6±0.0±0.0−6.6±1.4

Lean FH through the middle: +2.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (372 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
BH through the middle49%+6.0+1.5+1.6+9.1±2.7
BH crosscourt25%+7.7+4.0−0.9+10.8±3.5
BH down the line12%+2.2+1.4±0.0+3.5±3.3
BH slice through the middle8%−6.2±0.0±0.0−6.2±1.7
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.2+0.5±0.0−3.7±1.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (294 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
FH through the middle54%−3.2+2.6−0.7−1.2±2.8
FH crosscourt35%+0.5+1.2+1.2+3.0±3.7
FH down the line11%−0.6−2.5+0.3−2.8±3.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (83 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv VeronikaValue
BH through the middle48%−2.6+1.4−1.0−2.2±2.8
BH crosscourt32%+1.5+3.5+0.4+5.3±3.6
BH down the line20%−0.5−0.3+0.1−0.8±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (125 returns charted)

Veronika Erjavec returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KatieValue
FH crosscourt36%+5.3−2.8+3.9+6.5±3.6
FH down the line33%+1.5−0.2+1.9+3.2±4.1
FH through the middle31%+4.2−2.5+1.9+3.6±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (42 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KatieValue
BH through the middle34%+6.0+0.2+1.6+7.8±2.4
BH crosscourt19%+7.7+0.4+2.6+10.7±3.0
BH down the line19%+2.2+1.2+1.3+4.6±4.1
BH slice crosscourt17%−4.2+0.1−0.7−4.8±2.3
BH slice through the middle11%−6.2−0.3+0.7−5.9±1.8

Lean BH through the middle: +3.7±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (47 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Katie Volynets

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally+6.5±4.0+3.2+3.3
FH to their forehand · rally+5.6±4.1+3.1+2.5
BH to the middle · rally+4.0±2.7+2.9+1.0
BH to their forehand · rally+2.9±5.5+0.9+2.0
BH to the middle · return+2.7±3.5+1.7+1.0
FH to their backhand · rally+1.9±5.0+1.0+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+1.9±5.0+1.0+1.0
BH to the middle · return+2.7±3.5+1.7+1.0
BH to their forehand · rally+2.9±5.5+0.9+2.0
BH to the middle · rally+4.0±2.7+2.9+1.0
FH to their forehand · rally+5.6±4.1+3.1+2.5

Veronika Erjavec

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+4.5±3.0+2.5+2.0
FH to their forehand · rally+2.5±4.3+2.9−0.4
BH to their backhand · rally+1.0±4.0+0.7+0.3
BH to their forehand · rally−1.5±6.0−1.0−0.5
FH to their backhand · rally−3.4±4.5−2.3−1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−3.4±4.5−2.3−1.1
BH to their forehand · rally−1.5±6.0−1.0−0.5
BH to their backhand · rally+1.0±4.0+0.7+0.3
FH to their forehand · rally+2.5±4.3+2.9−0.4
BH to the middle · rally+4.5±3.0+2.5+2.0

Against Veronika Erjavec-like opponents

Katie Volynets vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.8%44.0%