RallyIQ

Game plan

Maria Sharapova v Karolina Pliskova

Every number combines what Maria Sharapova does well with what Karolina Pliskova allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Maria Sharapova wins, best of 3 74%90%: 62%–83% · best of 5: 78%
Serve points won 61.0% / 56.2% Maria / Karolina · tour 56.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 73%serve 61.0% / 56.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Maria Sharapova's record against Karolina Pliskova's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.2 on serve, +0.6 on return vs expectation (530 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMariaKarolina
Direction choice+0.20 ±0.04
better than 85%
+0.15 ±0.05
better than 80%
Shot selection+0.35 ±0.06
better than 83%
−0.12 ±0.08
better than 34%
Execution−0.22 ±0.24
better than 47%
−0.01 ±0.35
better than 60%
Points left on the table2.22 ±0.05
lower than 92%
2.45 ±0.06
lower than 70%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Maria Sharapova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMaria winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%69%70%72.7%±3.363% ▲
Body16%60%56%59.2%±5.21% ▼
T36%74%69%75.0%±3.436%

Optimal v Karolina Pliskova: +1.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMaria winsv KarolinaMatchupOptimal
Wide33%69%68%71.1%±3.829% ▼
Body10%57%55%55.3%±6.10% ▼
T56%68%69%72.1%±3.371% ▲

Optimal v Karolina Pliskova: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Karolina Pliskova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv MariaMatchupOptimal
Wide46%67%62%62.7%±3.539% ▼
Body15%63%55%60.6%±5.27% ▼
T39%75%68%74.5%±3.454% ▲

Optimal v Maria Sharapova: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +7.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKarolina winsv MariaMatchupOptimal
Wide44%74%67%75.0%±3.459% ▲
Body10%55%54%52.0%±6.60% ▼
T45%70%64%69.6%±3.441% ▼

Optimal v Maria Sharapova: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Maria Sharapova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH through the middle47%+4.2−1.0−0.4+2.8±1.5
FH crosscourt26%+5.3−0.9−0.8+3.7±2.7
FH down the line20%+1.5−0.9−2.9−2.2±3.3
FH slice through the middle4%−6.7−2.2−1.8−10.7±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−6.6−4.7+0.9−10.4±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.6±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1904 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH through the middle48%+6.0−1.4−0.6+4.0±1.5
BH crosscourt30%+7.7−2.3−0.4+5.0±2.5
BH down the line13%+2.2+2.8+1.2+6.1±3.8
BH slice through the middle4%−6.2−2.4−2.1−10.8±2.4
BH slice crosscourt2%−4.2−3.5−1.5−9.2±3.0

Lean BH down the line: +2.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1509 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
FH through the middle42%−3.2+2.0−1.6−2.8±2.3
FH crosscourt31%+0.5±0.0−0.6−0.1±3.7
FH down the line25%−0.6−2.1−1.4−4.1±4.7
FH slice crosscourt1%−14.9−0.1±0.0−14.9±1.3
FH slice through the middle1%−15.2−0.2−1.2−16.7±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (602 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarolinaValue
BH through the middle40%−2.6−1.7−0.8−5.1±1.7
BH crosscourt39%+1.5−0.8+0.6+1.2±2.3
BH down the line13%−0.5+3.1−0.3+2.2±4.6
FH inside-in3%+0.7+1.5−0.6+1.6±4.2
FH inside-out3%+1.4+0.2−1.4+0.2±4.0

Lean BH down the line: +3.6±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (850 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Karolina Pliskova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MariaValue
FH through the middle50%+4.2−2.0−0.6+1.5±1.5
FH down the line22%+1.5−0.7+0.8+1.7±3.3
FH crosscourt19%+5.3−3.9−1.7−0.3±2.9
FH slice through the middle5%−6.7−0.6−1.5−8.8±2.4
FH slice crosscourt3%−6.6−1.2−0.1−8.0±2.8

Lean FH down the line: +1.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MariaValue
BH through the middle43%+6.0+1.1−0.7+6.4±1.6
BH crosscourt23%+7.7−0.5+0.3+7.6±2.5
BH down the line15%+2.2+0.1+0.5+2.7±3.7
BH slice through the middle11%−6.2−0.5+0.6−6.0±2.2
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.2−0.9+1.9−3.1±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.0±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1161 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MariaValue
FH through the middle44%−3.2−2.2−0.7−6.1±2.4
FH down the line30%−0.6+3.8+1.7+4.9±4.7
FH crosscourt24%+0.5−3.5−5.5−8.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle2%−15.2−0.1−0.4−15.7±1.9

Lean FH down the line: +8.5±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (248 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MariaValue
BH crosscourt41%+1.5−1.4−0.4−0.3±2.5
BH through the middle36%−2.6+0.5−1.7−3.8±1.8
BH down the line17%−0.5−1.7−1.2−3.4±4.6
FH inside-in3%+0.7−1.8−5.5−6.6±3.8
FH through the middle2%−2.7+0.9−0.7−2.5±1.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (664 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Maria Sharapova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.4±7.3+3.2+4.2
BH to their forehand · return+4.9±3.5+4.4+0.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.4±2.6−1.0+5.4
BH to their forehand · return +1+3.4±4.5−0.8+4.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.1±2.6−0.2+3.2
BH to their forehand · rally+1.3±2.8−1.3+2.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−6.7±5.2−2.1−4.6
BH slice to the middle · return−6.5±3.3−3.8−2.7
BH to the middle · return +1−3.6±2.0−1.1−2.5
FH to their backhand · return−3.5±3.2−0.7−2.9
FH slice to the middle · rally−3.4±3.7−0.4−3.0

Karolina Pliskova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+4.0±3.3−0.1+4.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.4±2.6+1.0+1.4
FH slice to the middle · rally+1.9±3.2+1.5+0.3
BH slice to the middle · rally+1.2±2.2+0.3+0.9
BH slice to the middle · return+1.2±2.7+0.5+0.6
BH to the middle · rally+0.7±1.3±0.0+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−9.1±3.0−6.1−3.0
BH slice to their forehand · rally−6.9±4.7−3.4−3.5
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1−6.8±4.5−3.9−2.9
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.1±4.5−2.0−4.0
FH slice to their backhand · rally−4.0±5.6−2.1−1.8

Against Karolina Pliskova-like opponents

Maria Sharapova vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.4%45.3%
Players most similar to Karolina Pliskova3 58.7%44.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Naomi Osaka, Anastasia Potapova, Belinda Bencic, Ekaterina Alexandrova, Sorana Cirstea, Shuai Zhang, Veronika Kudermetova, Shelby Rogers, Anett Kontaveit. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.