RallyIQ

Game plan

Nick Kyrgios v Mackenzie Mcdonald

Every number combines what Nick Kyrgios does well with what Mackenzie Mcdonald allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nick Kyrgios wins, best of 3 64%90%: 41%–83% · best of 5: 67%
Serve points won 68.6% / 65.7% Nick / Mackenzie · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 68%serve 69.6% / 65.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Nick Kyrgios's record against Mackenzie Mcdonald's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −11.6 on serve, +0.5 on return vs expectation (272 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNickMackenzie
Direction choice−0.04 ±0.06
better than 46%
−0.20 ±0.11
better than 13%
Shot selection−0.09 ±0.06
better than 41%
+0.48 ±0.12
better than 91%
Execution+0.99 ±0.32
better than 95%
−0.70 ±0.58
better than 37%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.12
lower than 44%
2.79 ±0.14
lower than 31%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Nick Kyrgios +0.23, Mackenzie Mcdonald +0.73. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nick Kyrgios serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNick winsv MackenzieMatchupOptimal
Wide38%77%78%80.9%±3.628% ▼
Body3%62%62%61.5%±9.50% ▼
T59%83%78%85.2%±2.972% ▲

Optimal v Mackenzie Mcdonald: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNick winsv MackenzieMatchupOptimal
Wide46%79%79%83.8%±3.359% ▲
Body5%59%70%66.6%±8.80% ▼
T49%75%75%77.6%±4.341% ▼

Optimal v Mackenzie Mcdonald: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Mackenzie Mcdonald serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMackenzie winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide37%65%81%74.8%±4.050% ▲
Body8%60%65%61.8%±8.90% ▼
T55%73%78%75.6%±3.850% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +1.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMackenzie winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide49%68%80%76.4%±4.062% ▲
Body5%64%70%70.6%±8.95%
T46%62%74%64.1%±4.733% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nick Kyrgios returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.9+0.9+6.0±1.7
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.6+1.4+4.6±3.6
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.3+2.3+10.1±3.7
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+2.2+2.7+0.6±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+3.5−0.5−1.2±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1842 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+2.4+0.3+9.1±1.8
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+2.1−0.2+10.7±2.6
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.3+0.9−1.9±2.3
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.4−1.3+3.4±4.4
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5+0.2−0.3+0.4±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.0±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1682 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5+0.1+0.7−2.7±2.2
FH down the line20%−1.8+1.5+0.2−0.1±4.5
FH crosscourt17%−0.2+1.4+2.3+3.5±4.3
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.5+0.1−12.1±1.8
BH through the middle2%+0.1+0.8−0.2+0.8±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (593 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MackenzieValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.3+0.4+2.8±2.4
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.1−0.2−3.1±1.9
BH down the line15%−0.2+1.8+2.3+3.9±4.5
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.8+0.7−1.4±2.2
FH inside-in2%+0.6−1.3+2.3+1.6±4.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.7±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (1256 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Mackenzie Mcdonald returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3+1.1−0.2+5.1±2.0
FH crosscourt19%+5.5−2.6+0.7+3.6±3.9
FH down the line19%+1.7+0.3+1.5+3.4±3.8
FH slice through the middle10%−4.2+1.2+3.1+0.1±2.0
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+2.4+2.8+0.9±2.5

Lean FH through the middle: +1.4±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (419 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.4+1.2+10.0±1.8
BH down the line18%+4.2−2.5+1.1+2.9±4.2
BH crosscourt17%+8.8+1.1+0.6+10.5±3.0
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.6+0.8−4.0±2.0
BH slice crosscourt2%+0.5−2.8+0.4−1.9±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (509 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle59%−3.5+0.3+0.6−2.5±2.4
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−1.7−4.4−6.3±4.0
FH down the line16%−1.8+1.3−0.2−0.7±3.9

Lean FH down the line: +2.5±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (99 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−0.9+1.5−2.3±1.8
BH crosscourt29%+1.0−0.4+1.3+1.9±2.6
BH down the line15%−0.2+0.7+3.9+4.4±4.6
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.3+0.6−0.9±1.9
FH inside-out2%+1.0−0.5−0.2+0.2±2.7

Lean BH down the line: +4.4±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (362 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nick Kyrgios

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.7±2.3+1.0+3.7
FH to their forehand · return+4.1±3.4+1.1+2.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.2±2.4+1.0+2.2
BH slice to the middle · return+2.7±2.2+1.7+0.9
FH to their backhand · return+2.3±2.8+1.2+1.1
BH to their forehand · serve +1+2.1±4.1−2.1+4.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.4±4.1−3.9−0.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.8±2.1−3.9+0.1
FH to the middle · serve +1−3.3±1.9−2.7−0.7
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.1±2.0−2.2−0.9
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.9±2.1−3.0+0.2

Mackenzie Mcdonald

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+7.9±5.7+3.9+4.1
FH volley to their backhand · rally+5.2±5.7+1.1+4.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.3±2.0+0.1+4.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±2.4+1.8+1.8
BH to their forehand · return+3.4±3.5+0.5+2.9
BH to the middle · return+2.8±1.3+1.6+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−2.6±3.6−1.3−1.4
FH volley to their forehand · rally−2.5±5.7+1.9−4.4
BH to the middle · return +1−1.8±1.9−1.1−0.7
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.3±2.8−1.3±0.0
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.0±1.8+0.5−1.5

Against Mackenzie Mcdonald-like opponents

Nick Kyrgios vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.6%31.7%
Players most similar to Mackenzie Mcdonald2 56.9%33.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Gael Monfils, Botic Van De Zandschulp, Zhizhen Zhang, Nuno Borges, Arthur Cazaux, Daniel Elahi Galan, Jordan Thompson, Borna Coric, Guido Pella, Karim Mohamed Maamoun. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.