RallyIQ

Game plan

Robin Haase v Flavio Cobolli

Every number combines what Robin Haase does well with what Flavio Cobolli allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Robin Haase wins, best of 3 58%90%: 33%–80% · best of 5: 60%
Serve points won 65.2% / 63.5% Robin / Flavio · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 55%serve 65.5% / 64.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Robin Haase's record against Flavio Cobolli's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.8 on serve, +4.5 on return vs expectation (664 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRobinFlavio
Direction choice−0.13 ±0.05
better than 23%
−0.14 ±0.11
better than 21%
Shot selection−0.56 ±0.12
better than 10%
−0.07 ±0.21
better than 44%
Execution−0.60 ±0.33
better than 41%
−1.35 ±0.63
better than 14%
Points left on the table2.82 ±0.07
lower than 29%
2.80 ±0.13
lower than 31%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Robin Haase −0.23, Flavio Cobolli −1.35. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Robin Haase serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRobin winsv FlavioMatchupOptimal
Wide43%73%73%73.2%±5.237% ▼
Body7%58%70%64.8%±12.00% ▼
T50%76%77%78.3%±4.663% ▲

Optimal v Flavio Cobolli: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRobin winsv FlavioMatchupOptimal
Wide57%76%74%76.9%±4.751% ▼
Body7%57%68%62.5%±13.50% ▼
T36%71%74%73.0%±5.849% ▲

Optimal v Flavio Cobolli: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Flavio Cobolli serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFlavio winsv RobinMatchupOptimal
Wide42%66%72%65.1%±5.829% ▼
Body6%65%64%65.9%±10.56%
T52%74%76%75.3%±4.965% ▲

Optimal v Robin Haase: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFlavio winsv RobinMatchupOptimal
Wide58%70%75%71.6%±5.172% ▲
Body8%66%64%66.2%±11.20% ▼
T34%73%73%73.8%±6.228% ▼

Optimal v Robin Haase: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Robin Haase returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlavioValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+1.7+0.6+6.5±2.4
FH slice through the middle23%−4.2−0.3+0.1−4.3±2.1
FH crosscourt13%+5.5−2.3+4.4+7.6±4.3
FH slice crosscourt11%−4.3−1.8+0.7−5.4±2.5
FH down the line11%+1.7+3.1−2.4+2.3±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.6±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (728 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlavioValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4+0.4−0.6+6.3±2.2
BH slice through the middle20%−4.2−0.5−2.4−7.1±2.3
BH crosscourt18%+8.8−2.9+2.5+8.4±3.1
BH down the line11%+4.2+0.7+4.3+9.2±4.5
BH slice crosscourt9%+0.5−0.3−1.6−1.4±3.0

Lean BH down the line: +6.4±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (872 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlavioValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+0.9−0.1−2.7±2.7
FH down the line27%−1.8+2.3−1.6−1.1±4.7
FH crosscourt18%−0.2−1.1−2.9−4.2±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7−0.4+0.3−12.7±1.8
FH slice crosscourt3%−12.5−1.4±0.0−13.9±1.4

Lean FH down the line: +2.3±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (181 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FlavioValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.0+0.4−3.5±2.1
BH crosscourt20%+1.0−1.0−0.3−0.3±2.9
FH through the middle14%−2.9−0.1−0.1−3.1±2.3
BH down the line13%−0.2−1.5+1.6−0.2±4.9
FH inside-out7%+1.0−1.0−1.6−1.6±3.7

Lean BH down the line: +2.0±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (567 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Flavio Cobolli returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−0.5−1.9+1.8±2.4
FH down the line17%+1.7+0.5−2.5−0.3±4.3
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+0.6+0.7−2.9±2.3
FH crosscourt16%+5.5−0.9−1.6+3.0±4.3
FH slice down the line8%−4.3−2.1+0.1−6.3±3.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (365 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
BH through the middle32%+6.4−3.0−1.7+1.7±2.3
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2−1.0−1.3−6.4±2.2
BH crosscourt18%+8.8+0.2−0.4+8.5±3.3
BH down the line13%+4.2+0.1−1.7+2.6±4.6
BH slice down the line11%−8.4−0.4+0.3−8.5±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.5±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (436 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
FH through the middle59%−3.5−0.7−0.8−5.0±2.6
FH down the line21%−1.8−2.3+0.6−3.5±4.6
FH crosscourt20%−0.2−2.3−0.2−2.8±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.4±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (122 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RobinValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−2.3+0.1−5.2±2.0
BH crosscourt28%+1.0−2.8−1.0−2.8±2.8
BH down the line12%−0.2−3.2−2.0−5.4±4.9
FH through the middle11%−2.9−0.6−0.8−4.3±2.2
FH inside-out5%+1.0−0.1+0.6+1.5±3.4

Lean FH inside-out: +5.4±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (297 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Robin Haase

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+2.9±4.0−0.5+3.4
FH to their forehand · return+2.2±3.9+1.4+0.8
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.2±3.3+2.1+0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.9±3.1+1.0+0.8
FH to the middle · return +1+1.8±2.4+1.6+0.2
BH to the middle · serve +1+1.4±2.5+0.2+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.0±2.4+0.2−3.2
BH to their forehand · rally−2.3±3.4−1.4−0.9
BH to their forehand · return +1−2.0±5.0−2.3+0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.9±3.0−1.1−0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1−1.7±3.1+0.1−1.8

Flavio Cobolli

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1+2.3±2.6+2.2+0.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.2±2.9+1.6+0.6
FH slice to the middle · return+1.5±2.3+0.9+0.6
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.2±2.1+1.4−0.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.9±3.5−0.8+1.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.2±2.7−0.9+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−4.9±1.7−3.2−1.7
BH to their forehand · return−3.8±4.2−1.3−2.5
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.4±4.5−2.6−0.8
BH to their backhand · return−3.1±2.5−1.8−1.3
FH to the middle · return−3.0±1.9−1.2−1.8

Against Flavio Cobolli-like opponents

Robin Haase vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.9%34.9%
Players most similar to Flavio Cobolli3 62.2%38.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Jiri Lehecka, Gael Monfils, Marcos Giron, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Aleksandar Vukic, Fabio Fognini, Kyle Edmund, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Gustavo Kuerten. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.