RallyIQ

Game plan

Serena Williams v Sofia Kenin

Every number combines what Serena Williams does well with what Sofia Kenin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Serena Williams wins, best of 3 92%90%: 73%–98% · best of 5: 96%
Serve points won 68.4% / 57.5% Serena / Sofia · tour 58.1%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 90%serve 67.7% / 57.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Serena Williams's record against Sofia Kenin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +7.4 on serve, +1.6 on return vs expectation (382 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSerenaSofia
Direction choice+0.34 ±0.04
better than 97%
+0.21 ±0.05
better than 86%
Shot selection+0.47 ±0.05
better than 93%
−0.43 ±0.07
better than 14%
Execution−0.04 ±0.27
better than 59%
+0.04 ±0.37
better than 63%
Points left on the table2.20 ±0.07
lower than 94%
2.39 ±0.07
lower than 77%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Serena Williams −0.47, Sofia Kenin −0.80. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Serena Williams serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSerena winsv SofiaMatchupOptimal
Wide50%70%70%74.1%±2.843% ▼
Body8%62%56%61.2%±6.00% ▼
T42%79%78%86.3%±2.457% ▲

Optimal v Sofia Kenin: +1.1±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +8.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSerena winsv SofiaMatchupOptimal
Wide45%75%72%80.2%±2.848% ▲
Body6%60%57%61.1%±6.80% ▼
T49%70%69%73.6%±3.152% ▲

Optimal v Sofia Kenin: +0.5±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Sofia Kenin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSofia winsv SerenaMatchupOptimal
Wide47%67%65%65.5%±3.362% ▲
Body11%56%53%51.4%±5.50% ▼
T42%64%66%61.2%±3.638% ▼

Optimal v Serena Williams: +1.1±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSofia winsv SerenaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%63%66%63.4%±3.650% ▲
Body10%53%57%53.9%±6.30% ▼
T43%65%61%61.3%±3.550% ▲

Optimal v Serena Williams: +0.1±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Serena Williams returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SofiaValue
FH through the middle49%+4.2−2.6−0.2+1.4±1.4
FH crosscourt36%+5.3−1.6+1.0+4.7±2.5
FH down the line11%+1.5−0.4−3.4−2.3±3.4
BH through the middle1%+5.2−3.4+1.4+3.2±2.2
FH slice through the middle1%−6.7−0.7+1.2−6.2±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (2166 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SofiaValue
BH through the middle48%+6.0+0.3+1.4+7.7±1.3
BH crosscourt33%+7.7+1.3+0.1+9.1±2.0
BH down the line12%+2.2+1.1+1.3+4.6±3.6
BH slice through the middle3%−6.2−4.5−1.4−12.1±2.5
BH slice crosscourt2%−4.2−2.8+3.1−3.8±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1939 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SofiaValue
FH crosscourt43%+0.5−0.5−0.2−0.1±3.8
FH through the middle37%−3.2−0.1−0.6−3.9±2.4
FH down the line18%−0.6+5.3−0.3+4.5±4.9
BH inside-in1%+2.0−1.4±0.0+0.6±2.9
BH through the middle1%−1.0−0.2−0.1−1.4±1.6

Lean FH down the line: +5.2±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (750 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SofiaValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.5+0.9±0.0+2.4±2.3
BH through the middle30%−2.6−1.8−0.1−4.6±1.8
BH down the line17%−0.5+3.4−0.3+2.5±4.3
FH inside-in1%+0.7+0.7−0.2+1.3±4.0
FH inside-out1%+1.4+0.2−0.3+1.2±3.6

Lean BH down the line: +2.3±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (954 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Sofia Kenin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SerenaValue
FH through the middle38%+4.2−0.7−1.3+2.1±1.6
FH crosscourt29%+5.3−0.4−4.0+0.9±2.7
FH slice through the middle14%−6.7+1.0+2.1−3.6±2.1
FH down the line12%+1.5−5.1−1.4−5.0±3.6
FH slice crosscourt4%−6.6−1.5−2.4−10.5±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +2.9±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1287 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SerenaValue
BH crosscourt38%+7.7−1.8−0.2+5.7±2.5
BH through the middle37%+6.0−1.8−1.0+3.3±1.8
BH slice through the middle9%−6.2−1.5−0.2−8.0±2.2
BH down the line8%+2.2−1.1−4.1−3.0±4.1
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.2−2.2−2.8−9.1±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (887 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SerenaValue
FH crosscourt51%+0.5+3.7−3.0+1.2±3.3
FH through the middle41%−3.2−1.6−0.9−5.7±2.2
FH down the line8%−0.6−1.4+0.6−1.4±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (395 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SerenaValue
BH crosscourt52%+1.5−1.4−0.2−0.1±2.3
BH through the middle35%−2.6−1.2−0.3−4.1±1.8
BH down the line10%−0.5+1.0−2.1−1.7±4.5
BH slice through the middle1%−11.7−0.8+0.8−11.7±2.0
BH slice crosscourt1%−7.5−0.8−1.0−9.2±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.8±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (546 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Serena Williams

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+8.5±6.5+2.4+6.1
FH to their forehand · return+5.8±4.3+1.9+3.9
BH to their backhand · return+2.9±2.5+2.6+0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.2±4.1+1.4+0.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.2±3.7+0.9+1.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.1±4.0+1.7+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · return−10.0±3.0−8.4−1.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−7.3±4.2−3.6−3.7
BH slice to the middle · rally−5.4±2.6−4.8−0.6
BH to the middle · return +1−4.7±2.9−2.4−2.3
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.5±4.2−5.6+1.1

Sofia Kenin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH lob to their backhand · rally+8.2±4.2+3.3+4.9
FH to their forehand · rally+6.5±3.8+4.5+2.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.3±3.9+0.9+1.4
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.3±3.5−0.2+2.5
FH slice to their backhand · rally+2.3±4.5+0.7+1.6
FH slice to the middle · return+1.8±2.7+0.7+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−7.0±3.8−3.0−4.0
BH to their forehand · return−6.7±5.0−2.9−3.8
FH to their backhand · return−6.1±5.1−2.5−3.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1−6.0±3.4−3.0−3.0
FH to the middle · return−4.0±2.9−1.9−2.1

Against Sofia Kenin-like opponents

Serena Williams vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.1%45.1%
Players most similar to Sofia Kenin3 70.0%48.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Antonia Ruzic, Linda Noskova, Barbora Krejcikova, Clara Tauson, Aliaksandra Sasnovich, Anastasija Sevastova, Su Wei Hsieh, Anett Kontaveit, Johanna Konta, Elena Vesnina. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.