RallyIQ

Game plan

Sorana Cirstea v Elena Vesnina

Every number combines what Sorana Cirstea does well with what Elena Vesnina allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Sorana Cirstea wins, best of 3 94%90%: 77%–99% · best of 5: 98%
Serve points won 60.5% / 48.6% Sorana / Elena · tour 56.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 95%serve 60.6% / 48.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Sorana Cirstea's record against Elena Vesnina's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.2 on serve, −4.2 on return vs expectation (251 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSoranaElena
Direction choice+0.03 ±0.08
better than 59%
+0.07 ±0.20
better than 68%
Shot selection+0.24 ±0.14
better than 71%
+0.03 ±0.21
better than 47%
Execution−0.19 ±0.44
better than 51%
−0.91 ±0.99
better than 21%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Sorana Cirstea serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSorana winsv ElenaMatchupOptimal
Wide45%68%63%65.4%±8.354% ▲
Body17%55%55%52.7%±11.82% ▼
T37%69%75%75.9%±7.944% ▲

Optimal v Elena Vesnina: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +8.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSorana winsv ElenaMatchupOptimal
Wide47%66%65%65.4%±8.960% ▲
Body18%48%55%46.4%±12.13% ▼
T35%61%67%63.1%±9.737% ▲

Optimal v Elena Vesnina: +0.7±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Elena Vesnina serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowElena winsv SoranaMatchupOptimal
Wide40%60%66%60.5%±9.042% ▲
Body22%52%53%47.1%±11.27% ▼
T38%64%69%65.8%±8.951% ▲

Optimal v Sorana Cirstea: +1.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowElena winsv SoranaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%61%65%60.1%±9.033% ▼
Body27%50%64%58.3%±11.627%
T25%58%64%57.5%±10.940% ▲

Optimal v Sorana Cirstea: +0.2±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Sorana Cirstea returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ElenaValue
FH through the middle41%+4.2−1.1−0.8+2.2±2.8
FH down the line25%+1.5−0.7+4.4+5.3±4.3
FH crosscourt15%+5.3+2.9+1.6+9.7±4.2
FH slice through the middle11%−6.7−1.5±0.0−8.2±1.8
FH slice crosscourt4%−6.6+0.4±0.0−6.3±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.6±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ElenaValue
BH through the middle47%+6.0+0.7+2.0+8.7±2.6
BH crosscourt31%+7.7+0.6+1.9+10.3±3.4
BH down the line14%+2.2−1.3−0.1+0.8±3.8
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.2−0.2−0.7−5.1±2.9
BH slice through the middle3%−6.2+0.7−0.1−5.6±2.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (534 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ElenaValue
FH through the middle44%−3.2+0.7+2.1−0.4±3.0
FH crosscourt30%+0.5−2.1+1.0−0.5±4.3
FH down the line23%−0.6−0.9+5.3+3.8±5.1
FH slice through the middle3%−15.2−0.9±0.0−16.1±1.1

Lean FH down the line: +3.7±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ElenaValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.5−0.3+0.3+1.5±3.4
BH through the middle42%−2.6+0.9+0.7−0.9±2.6
BH down the line10%−0.5−2.4+0.3−2.6±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.4±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (271 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Elena Vesnina returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SoranaValue
FH crosscourt39%+5.3+4.1+5.0+14.4±4.2
FH through the middle35%+4.2+1.0−1.4+3.7±2.7
FH down the line13%+1.5−2.1−0.2−0.8±4.1
FH slice through the middle8%−6.7−0.2+1.9−5.0±2.1
FH slice crosscourt5%−6.6−0.5−0.1−7.3±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (98 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SoranaValue
BH through the middle35%+6.0+1.1−1.1+6.0±2.5
BH crosscourt33%+7.7−1.3−1.0+5.4±3.4
BH down the line16%+2.2−2.8−0.1−0.7±4.2
BH slice through the middle11%−6.2−0.1+1.9−4.4±2.3
BH slice crosscourt6%−4.2−1.0−2.0−7.2±2.5

Lean BH through the middle: +3.1±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (103 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SoranaValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.5+0.4−2.2−0.3±3.3
BH through the middle30%−2.6−1.8+1.6−2.8±2.4
BH down the line21%−0.5−3.0+0.9−2.6±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (66 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Sorana Cirstea

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return+4.0±4.5+1.1+2.9
FH to their forehand · rally+2.7±4.2−1.4+4.1
FH to the middle · return+2.3±3.6±0.0+2.3
BH to the middle · return+2.2±3.3−0.8+3.0
FH to their backhand · rally+1.2±4.9−0.5+1.8
FH to the middle · rally+0.5±3.2−0.9+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−1.8±4.2−0.5−1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−0.3±5.4+0.1−0.3
BH to the middle · rally+0.1±3.0−0.2+0.3
FH to the middle · rally+0.5±3.2−0.9+1.4
FH to their backhand · rally+1.2±4.9−0.5+1.8

Elena Vesnina

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+6.3±5.7+2.2+4.1
BH to their backhand · serve +1+5.2±4.7+0.5+4.7
FH to their forehand · rally+4.3±4.1+1.6+2.7
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.1±4.7+1.5+2.6
BH to the middle · return±0.0±3.2+1.1−1.1
BH to the middle · rally−2.2±3.2−0.6−1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−6.9±5.0−7.3+0.4
BH to the middle · serve +1−6.1±3.5−3.9−2.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.7±5.2−7.2+1.5
BH to their forehand · rally−5.7±6.0−5.3−0.4
BH to their backhand · rally−3.5±4.0−1.5−2.1

Against Elena Vesnina-like opponents

Sorana Cirstea vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–56.5%42.3%
Players most similar to Elena Vesnina2 51.9%36.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Iga Swiatek, Magda Linette, Varvara Gracheva, Olivia Gadecki, Veronika Kudermetova, Anhelina Kalinina, Su Wei Hsieh, Anett Kontaveit, Anna Lena Friedsam. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.